Jump to content
Just visiting?

Czarnikjak

Established Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    718

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Czarnikjak

  1. Czarnikjak
    Because there will be multiple clubs trying to out do others to get someone. Also they could possibly get them cheaper before 30th June. Also, if it's a European club they won't care if we get points deduction or not.
  2. Czarnikjak
    Because half of the clubs are nowhere near the £105m limit, so why would they go out of their way to help the other half that is nearing breaking the rules?
  3. Czarnikjak
    We are at risk, hence we asking for extra £30m. However, we can easily generate that £30m by selling a player if other clubs won't agree to the rules change. We won't get any points deducted, we have too many assets we can easily sell to generate that amount. I certainly cannot see other 13 teams voting for it to help us out though, so we will be selling for profit.
  4. Czarnikjak
    Majority of top cross country skiing athletes allegedly have asthma and take inhalers. Poor souls Imagine how good they would have been if they didn't have asthma
  5. Czarnikjak
    Fabrizio Romano said no, nothing to do with Kounde.
  6. Czarnikjak
    How far back in time do you go though? Huddersfield are 11th in terms of league titles...are they 11th biggest team in the country? Preston were very good before the wars, are they still big club? Truth is, we've done and won **** all of note since the 80s, and were left behind the current elite. We're not entitled to anything because of history, if we want to be the 4th biggest club we need to prove it on the pitch and build our image season over season (not just one of top 4 finish, that won't be enough to convince anybody).
  7. Czarnikjak
    As long as we keep Martinez, Konsa, Mcginn and Watkins I will be happy. Everybody else is expandable if good offer comes in.
  8. Czarnikjak
    Yes, this is correct in principle, although that £466m value is still being negotiated and it will be most likely higher. It is however incorrect to say that ANY team that doesn't qualify for Europe will be allowed to spend £466m, this is the nonsense that is being spread on the forum.
  9. Czarnikjak
    No, this incorrect information is being spread. Premier League clubs that don't qualify for Europe won't be able to spend £466m. They will be limited to %85 of their revenue.
  10. Czarnikjak
    Yes, in the nutshell. So if big teams want to spend more, it will be in their interest to distribute broadcast revenue more evenly to smaller teams. Win, win situation.
  11. Czarnikjak
    He migh be good option on the treatment bench next season...
  12. Czarnikjak
    There are 2 parts to this new regulations: 1. Anchor Cap - this can only be good for us and 90% of Premier League 2. 85-70 Cap - good for our owners wallets, bad for our competitiveness Both statements apply only to our current situation, and could change as our situation changes.
  13. Czarnikjak
    John Townley is usually clueless on this topic, but this tweet is correct.
  14. Czarnikjak
    Not sure where you reading this. All Athletic articles I read are pretty clear, for 24/25 season existing PSR rules will still be in place. For 25/26 onwards Cost Control rules take over.
  15. Czarnikjak
    The 85% cost control was voted in unanimously last week. Today's vote was for x5 anchor cap In Addition to cost control.
  16. Czarnikjak
    No, he got few things wrong there. He forgot about 85% limit for clubs that don't qualify for Europe. Also, when he says "to spend £400m on transfers" this is plainly wrong. There's no limit on "transfers"...only squad costs (wages, amortisation and agent fees)
  17. Czarnikjak
    You never know if you ready until you test yourself. Let's don't over complicate it, we might never get a better chance to play in Champions league.
  18. Czarnikjak
    Somehow Angebal is better at defending set pieces than Emery ball https://trigger-the-press.com/premier-league-set-pieces-67593/
  19. Czarnikjak

    Chelsea

    Czarnikjak replied to coda's topic in Other Football

    Problem was that the ref didn't give it real time. If he gave it (as he should) this would be a non story.
  20. Czarnikjak
    No! They will still be subject to 85% rule
  21. Czarnikjak
    85% limit for non European clubs will still stay with this hard multiplayer cap. This is not bad news for us at all...the whole 85%~70% cap is terrible for our competitiveness though.
  22. Czarnikjak
    No. This cap doesn't replace the proposed new Premier League PSR rules, it's only in addition to them.
  23. Czarnikjak
    That's pretty clever from Betfsir. Some United fans who can't count might still fall for it and hand them over some money.
  24. Czarnikjak
    That's a big if. We haven't seen Chelsea have 2 good games in a row this season. They can be all over the place.
  25. Czarnikjak

    Chelsea

    Czarnikjak replied to coda's topic in Other Football

    You wouldn't if we acted like them and won the game. This is only topic of conversation as we drew the game.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â