Chelsea 2-0 Bradford...
...to Chelsea 2-2 Bradford!
Yesterday: Oh Lambert doesn't have enough money, you need money to beat teams.
Today: Look! Look! Other teams lose games (against teams with no money).
Moral of the story. Don't blame money for the ineptness of the current manager.
Pathetic
Really? We've been told for weeks and weeks you need money to win games, now suddenly teams who don't have money win big games and having no money isn't an issue? What's that all about? Weird eh?
You're confusing the impact of money on a single match with the impact of money over 40-50 matches in a season. The point being made is that occasionally lower league teams beat bigger teams, and our failures in the cup under Lambert aren't particularly remarkable. I've pointed out before that we've won as many games against lower league teams as we've lost, which isn't great but not horrendous.
Well said, cup upsets happen and the manager shouldn't be slated for them. If mighty Chelsea can lose to Bradford then so can we.
They do happen. The issue is when they consistently happen and you're shit in the league. Again no sure why some look at one cup loss in isolation.
We've lost 3 times, we've won more than we've lost but people are obsessed with mentioning those 3 games.
Well that's the beauty of the cup, when you lose you cant lose again cos you are out of the cup. You can't lose more then once a year in the bloody thing.