But I think Mantis' point is, seeing as he seems to be the one fighting fire here, that he doesn't think anyone that we could currently attract would do a better job.
Now I'm not sure I agree with that (although there's obviously a big variable in who we could attract), but people seem to be twisting his words to interpret him as saying "Nobody could do a better job than Lambert" or, as you put it "This team wouldn't be better off managed by anybody else"
That's clearly not what he is saying. SO that restaurant analogy earlier didn't work either.
None of my post was aimed directly at anything Mantis has said. I was basically saying that we all know that a new owner will see a bigger improvement in us, most likely because we will have more money to buy players with, and also, because as OBE said in his later post, owners are the most important out of them and the manager. Player power can remove managers but it cannot remove owners, or it certainly has never seemed that way previously!
My points were that a new owner is needed and it goes without saying that it needs to happen before we properly progress. But, in the meantime, whilst Randy finds a price that someone actually wants to pay, we have to make do with what we have. The only difference that can really be made is the manager. We can either stick with what we have and hope for some kind of miraculous turnaround, which I think is looking very unlikely, or, we can get someone else in to see if they can get more out of the squad of players that we have.
It has nothing to do with money or ownership. Pure and simply, give another guy a go and hope that he gets more from what we have.