K-Carlsen

An interesting quote from the shrewsbury forum: "They played well for 55 minutes according to the radio, with the new loanee up front a contender for MOTM" Good one, son!

What happened to our interest in Ivelin Popov? Looks like a player with potential.

dysmenorrhea: painful menstruation eccloesiolatric: heavily involved in service verb and latit thing: don't remember antithesis: complete opposite obbligato: music limivorous: swallowing mud Hopefully that explains it But since this discussion already has an interesting topic, let's get back to it... and sorry for my antithesis-like effort in that matter.

Getting offended is such a weak emotion. "This is where I draw the line on your individual choice of behaviour". Pffff.... Given that you're into this chick, and the fact that you don't remember, there is a SLIGHT possibillity that you might have said or done something stoopid. That said, your chances are probably better if you act like it never happened or laugh it off if something is ever brought up. Compared to scenario of apologizing this and that and the moon and the skies. You didn't mess up, you were drunk. Sh*t happens.

The worst part is, that's ACTUALLY being conservative.

This, multiplied with this belief: "Human beings own the dog"

Talk of them getting Coentrao as well.. Damn.... Lloris Walker, Verthongen, Kaboul, Coentrao, Capoue/Sandro, Paulinho, Dembele Lennon/Chadli, Soldado, Bale Supplemented by options of Friedel, Dawson, Rose, Ekotto, Holtby, Parker, Sigurdsson, Defoe, Adebayor ++

Capoue in medical at spurs? Damn, they really need to lose Bale. They are looking too good now.

Been impressed with him the few times i've seen him, but might be a bit inconsistant from what I understand? Hopefully he takes the next step at wolves. Good luck to him.

I was personally hoping so at first, but tend to think that it would be good for him to play regulary somewhere else for a season. Don't know what Lambert is thinking, though We can always use Herd as 5th choice CB and 3rd choice RB this season (until his contract runs out) and hopefully have a more experienced Donacien pushing for these positions next season.

What about the likes of Robinson, Drennan, Donacien etc. Kevan? Heard anything?

Going for the obvious, Pardew. With Newcastle not improving under poor choice of new manager. I think the real problem up there is Mike Ashley. Another question is, although not PL related, HOW MANY managers will blackburn have this season?

I Like this. These kids all seem talented, but playing against harder physique in a faster tempo is the best way to test how good they really are. If they can handle it in the championship / league one they deserve a shot in the first team. Rocking the youth leagues doesn't necessarily seem to tell you that you have a gem on your hands. Re - Luke Moore, Fonz etc. Doing that in the football leagues, however. Re - Cahill, Westwood, Lowton.

Brings back memories of levitating off the sofa that one. Amazing! Can't wait for next seasons benteke gif's

Not neccessarily a full year loan, though? As with Burke, it might be more ideal to give them half a year "playing with men" in a lower league before they are given a real test in the prem.

And once again, sorry if that gave anyone a good ol' vaginismus. http://www.talktalk.co.uk/reference/dictionaries/difficultwords/data/d0013428.html

Well, while I can feel like a proper dysmenorrhea to some people, I do confess that i'm ecclesiolatric about words. There is always the fear of sounding too verbigerative, then again, we shouldn't be totally latitudinarian about either, you know? We'd have a totally antithesis of structure and that wouldn't be obbligato to anyone's ears. Also, I am limivorous. Also, google is my best friend. To answer your questions: Haha, sorry. And: no, it's probably not

Again, Lambert's transfer policy at work: We have matching pairs of Frenchmen, Danes, Irish. Next step matching pair of Spanishers It's Spanyolas. If we are to give Luna a fellow spaniard (i'm not even english, dudes!) to play with, pleeeease let it be Ruben Pardo! If we don't get him this season, he'll be way out of our league the next. Future star!

The guy that scores here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=shkYA6tqtcU Seems strange though. Not even listed in their first team. Played 6 games in 2011/2012, not played since. 20 years old. Center or right sided forward. Then again, Paul Lambert knows his stuff. If he says sign him up, I say sign him up

My thinking was that without the 40% depletion of phytoplankton, pollution wouldn't be such as problem due to higher amounts of O2 up there? I'm not exactly sure how this works on an molecular level though So yes, will read myself up on it. Interesting topic.

Alright, thanks. Agree with you as well, one animal goes, another comes or grows stronger etc. Edit: Both agree and disagree btw. As an animal is not only an animal, but a part of a whole ecosystem (some areas more fragile than others). If anything, i'd be a phytoplankton-hugger at this point and develope some kind of cloud formation technology to let our oceans get a little more sun ray. Which, by the looks of things, they might be doing already.

Ah, alright Out of curiosity, not being too much involved with huggers of trees, what is their beliefs / arguments?

If the average tree-hugger acknowledged that, he wouldn't piss me off nearly as much. Yes, but as a species intelligent enough to witness evolution we are also the only ones that is able to create / foresee the next environment. That does not mean that we have to accept responsibility for it, but that we can take it if we want. And the way things are headed the next environment might not be too pleasant for ourselves. Meaning, it might be that it would be benifical to adapt to taking responsibiliity and to take it towards a more positive direction somewhere down the line, not just look at it.

...and when things change it creates a new environment for the remaining and circle continues.

As in because they amuse and entertain you? Because as a Darwinean, survival of the fittest they are the opposite of great. But you could argue that being cute and cuddly looking is evolutionarily advantageous, as it gets us humans to protect them far more than we would if they looked like lampreys or camel spiders. If someone did seriously argue that as being the case, given the very short amount of time we've actually been conserving them (and by extension they haven't evolved visually at all in that space of time), then I fear that person wouldn't have much of a grasp of evolution. It might be advantageous that we find them cute out of dumb luck on their part, but they haven't evolved to that end. So it could be argued alright, but dismissed as the ravings of a loony just as quickly I'd argue that dumb luck is precisely what evolution is based on. Exactly. Evolution is the name of what you're looking at when you observe mixture of DNA over a long range of time. It is not "something of it's own" or some kind of natural law (it is rather the effect of the law). Survival of the fittest isn't survival of the most beneficial, it is those that survives long enough to spread their genes. The most beneficial people fought mammots and died. The "fittest" stayed in their caves and survived.