I also think it's unfair on Liverpool, bloody hilarious though but unfair.
Liverpool could justifiably say that they knew Suarez was volatile but after his last incident they had tailored his man management to get the best out of him whilst cutting out the controversy. They send him off to play with Uruguay who don't know how to handle him and he snaps again.
If one of our players does something crazy and reckless whilst on international duty we would all be livid on here if the player was banned from Aston Villa matches, it is hypocritical to think it is justified to apply to Liverpool just because we all hate Liverpool.
That tribalism is a lazy way of thinking.
I think the big difference is that if an Aston Villa player bit someone during a world cup game, we'd be livid with him.
If Benteke had never gotten injured, had finished the season with a flurry of goals and single handedly kept us comfortably mid table, then started the world cup in style before biting an opponent in his 3rd game and getting suspended for 4 months, i'd probably punch a hole in the wall.
But not because I felt like Aston Villa were being unfairly treated or because it was bullshit that our most important player is getting suspended for Villa games despite us having nothing to do with his indiscretion.
I'd be livid because the player is a **** moron and has hurt the club and his teammates with a moronic act. I'd be livid because this has probably hurt his future transfer value. I'd be livid because it might mean we don't achieve what we want to achieve next season.