StefanAVFC
-
Posts
34,184 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
69
Content Type
Gallery
Downloads
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Media Demo
Store
Events
Everything posted by StefanAVFC
-
We get to the DLC tracks and the internet dies. Sorry I was more irate than usual. Some shit going on (nothing to do with living situation) and not doing great at the moment. I'll be back to normally irate (but still pissed off as anything) soon :)
-
Is a picture of him, obviously at night, proof that he isn't rehabbing in warm weather? I don't rate him, don't particularly like him; but all this making things up to have a go at him is embarrassing.
-
They've bastardised the original franchise. Unforgivable.
-
https://www.inverse.com/article/8197-star-wars-battlefront-may-not-be-the-game-you-re-looking-for Fantastic article that sums up the 'game' pretty well. The bolded especially is staggering. How can a PS2 game have so many, yet a PS4 have 6!? So lazy.
-
That shit? What a shambolic disappointment that is. I've never been so excited by a potential game to be disappointed so badly :(
-
RB in flex isn't doable with 1 PPR.
-
Because violence is always the answer to violence I just hope the Russians are calculated in their attacks and don't take out civilians in the crossfire.
-
A good friend of mine did. Lives with her now.
-
The chances of the above happening totally randomly (and again this has nothing to do with how dirty the Seahawks play because it's penalties against Seahawk opponents) is 1/1024. Hugely unlikely. Not stirring a conspiracy or anything but it's so strange. Also, apparently Bennett/Avril haven't drawn a single hold all season. I find that staggering as they're 2 of the best DE's in the league. We play some shit, dirty football at times, but that doesn't mean that our opponents suddenly clean up their game every week, for 2 years.
-
Check the years... EDIT: Unless you mean the Jets are getting a rough ride too.
-
-
It's never going to be a substantial game with 4 planets and no single player
-
Don't get me wrong. We were AWFUL on Sunday but looking at stats, the disparity of penalties called against Seattle opponents is ridiculous. We have 5 first downs by penalty all season. League average is 17. Teams are penalised less against Seattle than any other team. Im not complaining about our penalties, but be consistent! arizona were holding all game, they had at least 2 delay of game not called. Reffing is general is pants.
-
I stopped reading when you didn't even know which century we're in to be honest.
-
You're around 15 years off with your century....
-
The whole poll is vague language and loaded language.
-
My take on the bolded is this. What does ISIS have, that a modern extreme Christian group such as Westboro doesn't? Stimuli. Westboro Baptist Church is a group of extremists in a majority Christian area (so you'd expect them to grow) that haven't grown. Why? No stimulus. The West attacks a majority Muslim country. The West symbolises everything that is wrong with the world according to Islam, interpreted by some devout Muslims. Sprinkle in xenophobia against Muslims in Western areas and you create a lot of pissed off people.
-
Exactly! And Pete, the 11% question proves my point if anything. 27% sympathise with the motives. Loaded language if you ask me. 11% think people who publish pictures of Muhammad deserve to be attacked. Sharp jump down when the language becomes more specific. I bet if you replaced attacked with killed then the number would drop just as sharply. Ergo, why those numbers don't worry me in the slightest, and on the flip side, that so many Muslims can't even sympathise with the Charlie Hebdo attack is reassuring.
-
I'd agree with you if the question in the poll wasn't 'do you feel sympathy' because of the reasons in my post above. If the question was more direct; 'do you think however many people in Charlie Hebdo deserved to die because they printed a cartoon of Muhammad?' then the percentage would be far, far lower.
-
The word 'sympathetic' or the phrase 'do you feel sympathy' is a bit loaded really. It's a bit naughty of the BBC to use it. I sympathise with people who hold anti-Muslim viewpoints because the world is a scary place to live in right now, and we have a large Muslim group that are committing atrocities. I sympathise with people who don't want refugees in their country, because they are coming from areas where these evil groups began. Does it mean I agree with them? **** no.
-
On the flip side Pete, I find it reassuring that such a large percentage directly disobey their faith by totally condemning violence even if somebody has committed such a cardinal sin (in the eyes of their religion)
-
'Some sympathy for the motives' isn't 'they should all die' is it? Somebody (person A) publishes a horrible, provocative picture of somebody's (person b ) loved one in a national paper. Person a attacks person b. You ask 1000 people whether they 'sympathise with the motives' (using the same language) and I bet a hell of a lot would say yes. Not a perfect analogy but the Muslims weren't asked 'do you think those people deserved to die?' they were asked about sympathising with a motive. If somebody killed somebody for sleeping with their wife. I'd sympathise with their motive but disagree with their act.
-
4 maps!?
-
I'm back tonight for this and rocket league but no **** extreme tracks
-
Not a catch and fumble apparently. I hate the NFL. Such bullshit.
