Jump to content

paul514

Established Member
  • Posts

    6,330
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by paul514

  1. A late tackle with no straight leg or studs showing
  2. 5th it is then, also that ain’t a red, people who think it is should go and watch ballet.
  3. I do know their turnover is several times ours as is all the sky six clubs turnover. So? In the days before any regulations that was the case for Utd and Liverpool for example, they could always bid more and pay more. FFP as a system is bankrupt, it stops investment in clubs and has sod all to do with a club going bust. If an owner wants to spend a billion quid out of his own pocket that is fine by me as long as the finances come from HIS pocket up front or from his pocket in the form of a bond which comes from his pocket, that is the only change I would make. PSR however is a great system, wages are what kill clubs, you might sign someone for free but if he wages are 9 million a year for 5 years that is a 45m pound commitment, extrapolate that to an entire squad, what happens if you stop getting CL or relegated etc. It's all a risk even when that cap reaches the eventual 70% in a couple of years time. Spurs spend less than 40% of their turnover on wages, that is a well run club! we spend 87% I think I saw the other day? completely unsustainable. If that means you have to sell someone who wants mega bucks, then so what it will help the FFP calculation.
  4. I don’t know, like you say we need someone comfortable with the ball which can be difficult with a DM it’s pretty different to our needs from a few years ago.
  5. We won’t sign another unless we sell cash, which I think we should if he is wanted for a decent fee
  6. PSR (capped wages to turnover) is a good thing IMO.... FFP isn't
  7. Maybe the lad is great, that isnt very likely though. He probably is here as the second choice whilst he develops.
  8. Extremely highly rated, I know he has dropped off loads, I don't know why. Tielemans will do though
  9. To my knowledge they have the 105m ffp cap and 70% wage to turnover cap that is being tapered in like it is in the premier league. All I am basically saying is even if the Premier League brings in more relaxed rules, if UEFA don't then it is irrelevant as you are spending money to get up the league and then into UEFA competitions. Therefore whatever rules they set are the rules everyone tries to adhere to.
  10. Very true, I have heard there has been meetings recently to increase the cycle amount. Now if that is for both the PL and europe I don't know. Unless its for both it is pointless
  11. We would if someone would pay that
  12. Best estimate for the book value in the summer of all the people listed on MaVilla's post is 43m Anything less is an FFP loss
  13. Getting rid of those helps PSR. If the total of those players are sold for lower than a certain value it actually damages what we can spend even though cash has come through the door because it is below their book value. Before making snarky posts I'd suggest you learn the subject you are being snarky around.
  14. He is a magnificent player and will do great things for us in the future.
  15. Yea best to use it to bring down our FFP loss and see what happens next season
  16. If there is anyone who thinks we may not comply this season then there can only be one or two I’ve not seen it on here. the trouble with increased CL/finishing place revenue is we can’t rely on it and therefore can’t spend accordingly or we will get in trouble when we don’t have it. its only a couple of teams that have been near guaranteed to get it each year and one of those didn’t finish in it last season.
  17. He plays for the best team in the world, who have the best striker in the world, you know the one who absolutely smashed all the PL records. but whatever you can have your own opinion....... even if its wrong.
  18. He is playing as a support player ...... I have the ability to see stats too.
  19. if it were guaranteed I would prefer that
×
×
  • Create New...
Â