colhint

I know its not quite so important but Durham was a washout today. Great news for the Bears

glad Durham drew

nah its a draw well done lads

why do you say that?

Absolute total result. Spot on

but tony I saw a politicians charity football match you played in when you to a freekick that went in off the wall. Typical more deflection

but if inflation is down next month does that mean they will have more cash

can anyone explain to me the difference between the NHS has more cash, but less in real terms

A very good player indeed. Welcome Charles to a club with no peers. When you retire from football you will realise the privelege you have had.

Politicians don't have to accept it - they don't face a permanent reduction in living standards. this every time

dont forget right wing Tory spin and idealogical

He researches tax dodging. He is probably the foremost authority on taxdodgers, and as a result is hated and attacked by them at every opportunity. There are two answers to your second question. People working for tax dodgers will say that one's legal and one's illegal, and anything that's legal is by definition right and proper. People not working for tax dodgers will say that the boundary between legal and illegal taxdodging is false and in any event frequently breached, and that taxdodgers lie and cheat to manipulate their returns so they appear to have avoided and not evaded tax. Me. I say it's all the same pack of cards, and we need to get tough with these people. Take that tax, close them down, prosecute them like we do "benefit cheats" (though tax dodgers cost us far, far more money). OK thanks, the only thing I dont get on this Murphy chap is on that link it says that tax avoidance is about £70m but on checking him he is an advisor to the TUC and yet they only quote £12bn, surely it would be in their interest to quote his higher figure. I do agree though that tax avoidance/evasion costs more

I'm sorry I don't know who Richard Murphy is. All I can quote from a quick search on google exluding Telegraph and Mail is the ones I posted. and whats the difference between avoidance and evasion

According to the Guardian and the commons public accounts committee the tax evasion may be £8.5bn The TUC thinks it might be £12bn

why are you one?

awol's gonna love this

knock off the ones who are not interested in Villa or those who dont want to buy anything that lost £30m+ last year

sorry I thought you were going to suggest someone

any luck?

So somebody then, no names, no one you know is interested, just somebody

And the alternative is who exactly

well they are nearly all Labour voters on here so if Randy is spending Millions and losing money he's great. If he wants to balance the books, he has no ambition, wants to sell the club, only in it for the profit etc,etc. To be honest if we had this poll 3 years ago I reckon the result would have been 99% in favour. For me he is still the best chairman in the league

How is he finished? He'll still be the head of a multi billion pound operation. He may have to rein back a bit but he will get anyone he wants. The people who are finished are those without his money who have upset the family.

can I correct a spelling mistake here. Fact is only spelled like this at the begining of a sentence. eg The fact is, I prefer red onion You should have written Red onions are the best. FACT

So he bumps up the price and we pay it do we? So whoever we buy next its OK for them to bump up the price if they want to aswell