People who seem to find similarities between USPS and Sky are always going to find similarities, but there are as many differences if people want to. Sky probably has more in common with La vie Claire than it does with USPS. I do honestly believe that Sky with the experience of track cycling (which USPS riders/coaches came from the track???) and other sports are pretty unique in cycling
People want to put Sky under scrutiny, yet when other teams are put under scrutiny we have claims of jingoism? I have no idea if Movistar are running a clean team, or Saxo Tinkoff, just the connections with doping is not just a random one, but well documented. You can point Sky had ex-dopers on team Sean Yates, Bobby Jullich and the client of Ferrari, Michael Rogers.
I am no more a fan of Sky, than I am of Garmin or Orica Greenedge. I am a fan of clean cycling with healthy scepticism of everyone, but I can’t bear the fingers being pointed with no real evidence, nor any rumours.