Jump to content

kidlewis

Established Member
  • Posts

    4,462
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by kidlewis

  1. Thanks for clearing the save thing up. it’s so annoying everyone has just let this go apart from us. media just shrug their shoulders and leave it. Is anyone fighting our corner or challenging those in charge at all? obviously we can’t overturn the result but just like bloody brexit this is a case of “nah we didn’t lie, you’re just not believing in us enough”
  2. It’s so energy sapping I’ll have to stop myself. Just want to chin every one of them. even the PMOL statement proves they got it wrong. He never ever received the ball from Mings. He tackled him. Anything short of 3-0 v Newcastle and I’ll be livid still. Need to improve our GD beyond the 2-0 loss against the lesser Manchester.
  3. Admit I’ve gone into it big time kicking off with all the city rocket polishers. Apparently Mings had the ball under control but the exact same incident with Ronaldo, the defender wasn’t controlling it. either way it’s wrong because it’s about a deliberate act to play the ball. Having it under control doesn’t come into it
  4. KDB apparently out for ten games. Might cost them some points. Hopefully that’ll learn them
  5. Still livid. their interpretation is, Mings made a deliberate act towards the ball, a new phase ensued and therefore no offside. now can anyone explain why the following is now NOT onside. Watkins goal hangs offside by miles. McGinn slams the ball at the keeper, he smothers the ball and it spills out to Watkins. he taps it in. GOAAAAL. their interpretation now means the above is now a goal. That right?
  6. Can we get someone who is a journalist to ask the tough question ? People are missing the point. Mings chests the ball, a new phase is correct but Rodri is STILL in an offside position when Mings chests the ball. He then comes back to an onside position to tackle Mings. The law states that is offside through gaining an advantage. That law is there for pass backs and opposition players “receiving a ball” from an opponent. And despite this new phase law, it DOESNT MATTER because Rodri is still offside. am I missing something? it’s not like he was offside, runs back onside as Mings chests it and tackles him. That’s allowed. this goal still isn’t legitimate at all.
  7. Hope cov smash blues, would be funny to have the tenant bankrupt the landlord through pushing them into the zone
  8. This is Levy territory. Not a fan of such a mickey take. Makes us look like bell ends. like when my mate offered the dodgy trinket sellers in Tenerife €1 for a pair of fake Ray Bans and the guys lost their sh**. scary time!
  9. I will be in a foul mood if we don't win this game.
  10. magazine another rant from me I know but even their own statement STILL means it’s offside. he didn’t receive the ball from Mings, it wasn’t a misplaced pass. He tackled Mings.....
  11. After the dirty city and Moss debacle, I hope we smash these barcodes so bad we get sent to The Hague for a ****ing War Crime.
  12. Mings you absolute IDIOT. As soo as that Halppened it was always a goal. STOP BEING A BELL END
  13. I feel this will be a really solid and hard fought 1-0 loss. we had this a few years ago
  14. Barkley, minutes, not injured. Good news. poor decision making today but some good moments
  15. I’m all about the numbers. he needs goals and assists. How many games isn’t as much of an issue but would mean he’s need to be phenomenal every time he comes back to the side. Certainly gives the physios and doctors their chance to earn their bread and butter when it comes to managing players fitness. You’d want Barkley to be hitting close to Jack numbers (roughly 1 goal and 1 assist every 6 matches) Barkley currently 1 in 10. Caveat being how many of his 208 matches have been bit part substitutions at Chelsea. Quite a few I imagine. if he plays half a season he should end with 3 goals and 3 assists, that’s not £30m worth of return over a contract. So he does need to be playing more than he has this season. Providing he comes back and doesn’t get injured again should mean he plays over 2/3 of the season.
  16. We have a good chance. It might be rearranged but we play Leicester two days after they are away in Prague. That’s a good a time as any to play them. We have a habit of getting managers sacked. We could sort Bruce out next
  17. We will still be a couple of games behind for a while but with City and Newcastle this week. You’d hope for 3+ from those two. puts us 8th with two in hand over most after this weekend is done and dusted. we’ve got a real opportunity to go with the top half group and not the bottom half. by the end of Jan I think we will know which half we will end up in.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â