zak

I put down a "non refundable deposite" down on my house. Basically i couldnt back out, but if the deal didnt go through for another reason i would have got my money back. Id say if he failed a medical or didnt want to come Villa would have got their money back. Although not 100% sure how failing a medical goes as im sure its not really an either you pass or fail so would be difficult to judge.

Oh no, there are definatly a couple of them but for me there is one that stands out a lot more than the rest of them

There is 1 poster in particular who seems to be in the center of every "debate" It doesnt help when other posters react but i cant believe he hasnt been banned yet!

I had this problem when i had long hair. Ended up cutting it myself for about 6 years while at college. Seemed to work a treat and could never be angry with anyone but myself. Added bonus: saved a few bob

Ah yes but the majority of people arent laying tricks let alone huge tricks EDIT: Also i wouldnt say that isnt extremely cool but its impressive, cool skiing (and boarders) its all about style! e.g a well spun 3 is better than a poorly spun 5.If your looking for the coolest skiiers look no further than TJ Schiller and Jon Olsson! also check out Jon Olsson's car:

I have done a day in remarkables in New Zealand but that was i think in 2005. It was pretty limited in Comparison to the Alps, i think there was only 5 chair lifts when i was there. I hear its improved since but i dont think i could suggest it to skiiers or boarders who frequent the Alps or resorts in the States and Canada Personally i really want to go boarding in Chile, that would be amazing! Im hoping to go boarding in Les 2 Alps on the glacier this summer again! Its the perfect trip for a Park lover like myself. Have a few obsticals though like money, days off and i am meant to be moving house when i want to go. On the Skiing vs Boarding argument one is not better than the other, they are different things. I can do both to a fairly good standard depending on who im talking to, im no baselayer (although i did try to give her a tip after seeing a photo :oops: :shock: ) Skiing is more active, you have to put in effort to ski well down a mountain, while boarding the better you get the less effort it is. I am a boarder at heart but with all the changes to skis (fat boy twin tips etc) a skiier can nearly enjoy everything about boarding without switching and im not sure the same could be said the other way round. Then again only pricks with sticks want to do moguls anyway

Im with the 'I trust Randy' group and will also back any manager that comes in, even if it was our very own Sir_Gary_Cahill and he replaced Bent with Ethan Moore. Anyway the one thing i do know is: Mystery Man is no mystery to the club. They know him and he is well connected in the club. There would be few people who know more than him about whats going on at the club, very few. He never commits to something that isnt certain for entirely that reason. Anyway, i know he will never be back after all this and if hes reading this, i just want to let him know thanks for sharing, most of us really appreciated it! We totally understand why you wont be back P.S pm me if your itching to share at any time

people not keeping to the rules of the lovely ladies thread. wouldnt mind that thread still being around

Where's that said then? I would like to say my brain is frazzled from work today but truth is iv done absolutly nothing today so.........

To be fair BOF, you could well not say 'fillum' but from my experience with Ireland (5 years at UCD and countless Holidays) and Irish People (any and all my relatives, all my college friends and family friends) i have noticed that most Irish people dont even know they say 'fillum' instead of film and often when you ask them to say that specific word on its own, they say film yet in a sentence, not thinking about it specifically, they will say 'fillum' The best part about it is I have never met someone who says 'clingfillum' rather than clingfing. So i guess this fairly annoys me as i just dont understand why both would be pronounced differently

Fair enough I was just emhasising light as different to virgin, as extra virgin oil has flavour and supposibly would work any way either way, My mate is looking alot better

Thats slightly different to what the book says Book says he lost the weight just consuming extra LIGHT olive oil your not allowed to eat or drink anything but water an hour before or after the times you take the olive oil Something to do with taking calories with no flavour connected to it, you lose your appetite and slowly slim down and then a very small amount of oil a day (which is pretty good for you) keeps your weight down and you can eat and drink whatever you want Anyway i have a friend who used to be a little too big, who slimmed down and now keeps his weight down doing it. Says it was easier than changing your diet and would make changing your diet easier aswell as it cuts out cravings. Every month or so he spends a week not on the oil as he claims he would get too thin if he stayed on it the whole time

You guys should read a book called Shangri - La diet, by Seth Roberts, he is a serious prefessor from somewhere and is mentioned in 'Freakonomics' He used himself as a tester to find an easy way to loose weight, which he most successfully found that certain amount of either sugar water or flavourless oil could do. All you have to do is consume small amounts of 1 or both in the right way and you dont have to change your diet or what foods you eat. They just work in supressing your diet. Anyway he refers to the fact we like foods that are bad for us because your body assocciates flavour with calories. So the more calories you end up consuming with a certain flavour the more that flavour becomes tastier to you Also he claims you have like a thermostat for your weight were your body wants the set amount of calories to reach that weight. however if you consume more calories it pushes the thermostat up so therefor the standard weight your body tries to set is larger. Im kinda of confusing myself, i read it a while ago. but it all comes from historic times where when there was an abundance of food it would cause your body to want to intake more and more pushing its desired weight up and up, and when food was scarce it would bring your desired weight loser...so similar to Animals that hibernate. However we still have this system but food is never scarce. This is why for most people if they wanted to eat what they liked (their body wanted) theyd become overweight and why we like foods with more calories ah just read the book!

exciting....what do stalker points get me? Legov it is kind of fake but often you can tell the girl knows you just did it to speak to them, but i think they quite like it. its worked for me before. Then again i met a girlfriend through her sending me a message on facebook before i had ever met her. she apparently saw me do an air guitar competition in my university (UCD) So facebook has helped my sex life alot!

Well i dont see how you can do that unless you actually stalk her! chat to her a little bit and then when you think shes confortable suggest a coffee or something personally i enjoy flirting over fb chat, especially with someone you dont know so well. especially as you get that extra second for your witty remarks. anyway if it works, im expecting photos, thanks!

Do you use Facebook chat and does she? If so id write her a message, anthing really.... then apologise and say you wrote to the wrong (insert her name) then depending on how you feel with the situation say one of the following how are things anyway? quite forward if you only met her breifly or hope all is well anyway. its not an response she has to respond to but she can if she wants thats what id do, what have you got to loose

do you like jewellry? suck my D**k its a F**king Gem Do you work in subway? Coz youve just given me a footlong your eyes are like spanners girl: what i said your eyes are like spanners ...... everytime you look at me my nuts tighten

Interesting stats - if Liverpool pay £35million for Andy Carroll they are getting a player outscored in the Championship last season by Peter Whittingham, Nicky Maynard, Gary Hooper, Michael Chopra and Charlie Adam.

Photoshop Tutorial Rap.

:oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: :oops: wheres that pool at the start of that clip? looks like les deux alps summer season but none of your tricks are from there i dont think so guessing it just looks the same apologies!

thats pretty good stuff if you arent just joking and would actually like better control, bend your knees more and dont look down, look infront. suggestion is to look to the end of the box when getting on it then look to the landing, just dont look at your feet i am a qualafied instructor not just a randomer telling you something wrong, although i havnt got my freestyle coaching. i have done the training for it though

Ok so i know very little about photography, but my boss is a serious (i mean serious) photographer he wants me to sell his lense where is the best place to sell this its a Hasselblad 300/4.5 Hc lense and retails at £ 2500.00 the camera is still good quality, just a little wear on the outside where can i sell this? so far i have looked 3 places robert gray of westminster - bring it in to be examined robert white - around 800 hassleblad retail - around 1000 anyone know anywhere i can sell this for the value its worth?

If i knew i could have saved them but by doing nothing they died, then yes, I would feel responsible etc. Fair enough, I may very well feel that way too. But I was also talking about legal responsibility. What's worse? Neglect that killed 5 people, or a direct action which killed 1? Personally, i wouldnt even think about legal responsibility, i think i would take the chance of any legel actions to save net of 4 people i understand life would always be different after killing this one person but the fact you saved 5 would help you through

well i voted yes...but thinking about in unsure! he shouldnt be our 1st or second striker if we are trying to push on for CL and eventually challenge for the title! hes better than heskey and played well against Palace so bring in a quality striker and i think Carew and the fonz as back up to this new striker and gabby wouldnt be bad. so i would offload heskey first and if we can bring 2 strikers in offload carew aswell

Warnock for me.....think, he was on his way to getting MOTM on sat if he didnt go off injured. think it is a lot harder for a left or right back to get such a reward. i wonder how many goals hes stopped and how many goals he has helped set up