games, lets see how many games he has won and his win ratio
then lets compair it to others
Fulham 43 14 16 13 win ratio = 1 win in 3 or 1.3 points per game
Man City 77 36 16 25 win ratio = 1 win in 2.1 or 1.6 points per game
Blackburn 188 82 47 59 win ratio = 1 win in 2.3 or 1.56 points per game
so the BEST he has done was after spending £230 million pounds on players and he manages 1.6 points per game
houllier for villa in a terrible season league and cup
played 39 won 14 drew 11 lost 14 win ratio = 1 win in 2.8 or 1.36 points per game
BETTER than hughes at fulham
so houliers first season which had all sorts of disruptions from the very start was more successful than hughes at fulham.
Oooops.
Did Hughes spend 28 Million in the January Window? No didn't think he did and yet they still finished higher than us. Ooooops back to you.
shit? who spent 28 million in january?
chelsea? liverpool?
i know villa didnt, so who are you talking of?
can i also check to see if teams get deducted points under the " its not fair, you have more money than me" rule?
ahh, they dont.
or should we go on the actual outlay from each club?
that season we spent 3 million pounds
we got £26 million for milner and £3 million for davies
we paid
£18 million for bent
£8 million on ireland ( still makes me sick)
£6 million on makoun
leaving a total spend of £3 million and im sure we sold sidwell for 1 million or so and shorey i thought we sold for £2 million? but not including them we paid out £3 million over what we made on transfers.
a quick look at fulham and they have spent more than we did
and as mentioned houlier achieved a higher points per game and better win ratio in his time at our club than hughes
oh dear
Trying to compare points per game and then including cup games is deliberately trying to distort the figures in my book, as is including games when Houllier was hospitalized. In the league we had an average of 1.23 points per game under Houllier by my reckoning.