I wonder that too - especially if you'd seen the dispatches program on last night on C4.
Nadine Dorries' association with Andrea Williams and the Lawyers' Christian Fellowship is not the best of alliances.
I watched that too, acting as a mouthpiece for the evangelicals in parliament, which is disturbing enough.
That said, I was watching BBC Parliament last night ( I lead an exciting life me ) and on the keenly contested abortion debate she called herself pro choice, and pro stem cell research which was confusing. She was actually more articulate intelligent than I'd have thought after having seen that programme too. Still wouldn't trust her mind.
But further to this debate, it is very easy to take the science position as a simple "bugger off religious people" angle, but from readings elsewhere the opinion of some in the research community that whilst no line of research should be closed off, but the iPSC's ( see my post above ) will eventually make the use of embryo's redundant, and they won't have to deal with all the opposition, however ill founded it may be, and will be able to work on it hassle free.
Still glad it wasn't banned, but enthusiasm for embryo research will drop if the other research turns out as expected.
on the abortion thing, mind literally so disturbing how many par liamentarians actually refused to take into account the viability of the foetus' based on current evidence. Also a ridiculous level of emotive arguments using single cases of a rare survival and using it as a stick to beat the 24 limit with, personalising politics on this just awfully irresponsible imo