Missing the point a bit though. The fact is that we do have the aforementioned strikers on the wage-bill so unless Lambert is going to get rid of a couple of them, no new strikers should be added and he should be pragmatic enough to work with what he has. Obviously though, 'Lambert' and 'pragmatism' are words that you will seldom find in the same sentence.
Also, what about when Benteke and Kozak return to fitness? We'll basically have a third-choice striker on biggish (by our standards) wages* that could be better used elsewhere. Not to mention that Bendtner is the sort of player who will instantly kick up a fuss about it also.
*Anyone who thinks Bendtner will come here for less than something like £25k/w (if that) is deluded.
I don't think the future wage bill issue is much of a concern to Lerner anymore, as he's practically checked out.
It's almost like we have no owner at the moment, so any longer-term view is largely irrelevant. Whether we are interested in Bendtner or not is up for debate, but I fully expect a few more freebies coming in, should we add to the squad.
In lieu of any transfer fee, putting a free agent on a contract creates a new, sell-on value for them - effectively offsetting some of their wages if sold.
Benteke has shown that he doesn't come back from injury by hitting the ground running so, even if he returns in the new year, it may take a while to hit form again. Kozak may not be ready for the start of the campaign and in our position we need to get as many points as we can, as quickly as we can.
Who knows about Bent - was behind the kids in the pecking order at Fulham.
I wouldn't be surprised to see another experienced striker come in, and possibly another midfielder in the same vein.
Tell that to QPR and all the free transfers they signed from higher clubs, dropping down to 'do them a favour'