I don't think it's disrespectful at all.
I'm relatively pro houllier. And if he recovers and stays on I'll have no problem with it.
However, even if (and when, hopefully) he fully recovers I think it's a very likely scenario that Houllier will call it a day for management.
It;s not like we're saying "Houllier's definitely going to pop his clogs, who shall we replace him with"
The fact is that Houllier having managed his last Aston Villa game is a very likely scenario, even though he will likely make a full recovery. Discussing who we think will take over if this likely scenario occurs is in no way disrespectful, just a little presumptuous at worst.
Yes I understand that but this thread was going on for quite a while before he got taken ill... infact quite a few months... that's why I said 'Meant to post this a while ago but was busy'.
At which point Houllier was getting the dreaded vote of confidence, and it wasn't looking unlikely that he could be sacked.
Is it disrespectful to discuss who we could replace Young with in the Summer when he's likely to leave?
Not disrespectful Stevo but any thread of that nature is usually locked... "we don't allow pure speculation threads".
Luckily for this thread, a couple of mods are more than happy to discuss Houllier's replacement, despite breaking their own precious rules.
IMO, of course