DanishVillan

Bit more complicated than that imo. For the first few years of WW2 danish resistance were called terrorists too. By the occupiers and our government. Now we give them medals. I agree the boundary between terrorist and freedom fighter is often blurred and the distinction is all too often down to perspective. My own definition though, which I think works is that if a group is fighting a state and state forces it is legitimate for some to consider them freedom fighters even if that view isn't shared by all. However, whenever innocent civilians are intentionally targeted then I don't think any group, whatever the legitimacy of their cause can be considered anything other than terrorists. If Israel is intentionally targeting civilians or civilian facilities such as hospitals that in my view is state terrorism just as Hammas firing rockets at Israeli cities is terrorism. The term Innocent civilian is blurred as well during war. Israel is calling everyone inside Gaza a terrorist or collaborator. From inside Gaza all adult Israeli could be viewed that way as well. With +2 years of terror training.

Bit more complicated than that imo. For the first few years of WW2 danish resistance were called terrorists too. By the occupiers and our government. Now we give them medals.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=KbO0f9uaWZE

I was a Villan before Kent Nielsen joined. Like with all small nations its up and down but it isn´t that bad here. Denmark got less people than London and has been to every Euro since ´84 except 2008. FCK is doing somewhat ok and hopefully Aab will too but Brøndby is lacking. We got some great young players coming in Eriksen, Fischer, Højbjerg etc. and hopefully we can avoid filling places with crap or players who never plays for their clubs.

Sadly he is the best danish striker by some distance. Cornelius, Helenius etc. can only dream of reaching his level. Still a big no though.

Both our teams were shockingly poor..But you ended 3rd.

Also Sweden...Fan.

Called up today as last player.

Building stadiums they don't even plan to use afterwards. Ridiculous. they will be used in countries that cant afford them Countries that voted for them. What is it called when you give something to someone in exchange for votes...anyone? A conspiracy theory?

Could you point me to any country outside UK that doesn´t give two shits about international football? Just because you guys want a better side is no reason to skip it all together. Its nothing to do with wanting a better team, international football is boring full stop. I am often bored shitless during internationals wether it be friendlies, qualifiers or tournaments That is your opinion and fair enough. Your last post sounded like it was the complete majority opinion amongst fans and players and that is what I was questioning. I find La liga boring.

Could you point me to any country outside UK that doesn´t give two shits about international football? Just because you guys want a better side is no reason to skip it all together.

How could the physio tell him to go on with that kind of injuries? F**k.

Columbus was around 500 years too late.

"You are either with us or against us" - The junior Bushmaster So Putin support the regime that the US happily sent prisoners to for torture and the UK happily sold sodium fluoride to. Against the group that the west created to fight the Sovjet Union but is now considered terrorists anywhere in the world but Syria. Fascinating

Help kickstart World War III http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-sdO6pwVHQ]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z-sdO6pwVHQ

I don´t think we will get that 2nd spot. The decline had started before 2012 with a number of players retiring that we couldn´t replace. Jon Dahl Tomasson, Christian Poulsen, Jesper Gronkjaer etc. These guys are far from the best we have ever had, but still proved difficult to replace. Another problem is bad choices regarding clubs. We had alot of players with splinters in their arses. After 2012 players like Rommedahl and Bendtner went missing as well. None of those should have been that hard to replace but they were a large part of the reason we qualified. At the moment we lack quality and/or competition in all positions except maybe CD. Hopefully the Ajax-kids and others like Okore, Patrick Olsen and Pierre Emile Hojbjerg (If he doesn´t end up choosing to represent France) can improve us in the coming years. As for golden generation, we were considered a dark horse at Mexico 86. Most Danes consider that team the golden generation. (And M. Laudrup was part of that)

We do suck at the moment and were very lucky to win at Malta. Some strange selections from M. Olsen didn´t help but overall it´s a lack of quality. Bendtner is still our best striker by a distance and he is busy, destroying a career. We do have decent kids coming through and a lot of hope is pinned on them.

That's barely relevant at all, unless of course another part of this operation was to fly planes into a tall building and the Pentagon and then blame it on Islamic terrorists? What do you mean, nothing has been debunked? Pretty much all of it has. All of the "questions" that have been asked by the so-called "truthers" have been answered extensively. And the fact that they found no WMDs in Iraq doesn't fit in with the conspiracy either. Don't you think that if the Bush administration was able and willing to carry out a false flag attack of the size of 9/11 (flawlessly no less) then forging evidence of WMDs in Iraq would be child's play? The nationalities of the hijackers doesn't fit in either. If 9/11 was all planned from the start so that the US would have a pretext to invade Iraq, then how come none of the hijackers were Iraqi? Most of them were Saudis, which was rather inconvenient actually. Again, you'd think that if they were able to pull off something like that it wouldn't be hard to put in some forged evidence linking Iraq to the attacks. Well, they are on their 3rd attempt at explaining WTC7. Were you a "truther" before that, or did you believe as much in the previous 2 explanations. The current explanation (inward bowing due to fire and damage) is 100% computerbased and they wont show what variables were used. The same report claims that fire had a very low possibility of causing this. (Considering it had never happened before 9/11) Free-fall speed is difficult to explain without explosives and they didn´t look for that. Others did though and found plenty of traces. Good question about the WMDs. No idea how they managed to mess that up. We should ask them at the warcrime tribunal. 9/11 was not for invading Iraq but for the global war on terror. Would have been solved too quick if it was just one country that had been bombed few years earlier. Lecture from 2011 by a Swiss historian from Basel University.

And I can´t believe people think a terrorgroup who could pull an operation like that wouldn´t brag about it. Nothing has been debunked. Bush and co on the other hand has been proven to be liars after 9/11. (womd´s) The Manhatten Projekt says hi.

Yeah my mind is made up. I want a new investigation. With a commission that isn´t handpicked by the suspects. Same with just about all the groups of relatives to the victims, without whom, we wouldn´t have had any investigation. There are 1000´s of architects, engineers, firefighters, pilots etc. who would agree. So it is not debunked, nor is it preying on the victims like you suggest. What would you call the official explanation if not a conspiracy theory? a coincidence theory? If Bush (and co) has got nothing to hide I would suggest he stopped acting guilty and gave the explanation under oath. Without Cheney at his side. What went wrong with "Able Danger"? What went wrong with Norad? What is his relation to the Bin Laden family? etc. Or, just release the footage from all the cameras around the most heavily defended building in the world. He could remove all this doubt in seconds if he is innocent.

Finn Laudrup >>> Michael and Brian Laudrup >>> Andreas Laudrup.

Well, compared to any official explanation given, that documentary is a shining light of truth. Same with the Italian "Zero" If you honestly believe 'loose change', I can only suggest that you read some of the point by point rebuttals of its nonsense. I recall there being an evidenced, minute by minute, breakdown of the film that is a very good resource. If you do that, and still believe it... Well, let's leave it there. Well I didn´t say I do. I said the official explanation is worse. Remember people who doesn´t believe in it is called "Truthers" not conspiracy-nutters. Guess why. If you think fire and damage took down Building 7, in a way that makes demolition experts look like amateurs, then you are probably right we should leave it here. Would love a link to your debunking 911myth film though. Almost as good as a proper investigation.

Well, compared to any official explanation given, that documentary is a shining light of truth. Same with the Italian "Zero"

Obamas so called reluctance is about American boots on the ground. He prefer to use foreign hired mercenaries. ("rebels")

Iran doesn´t have oil? I thought they were a large supplier of both China and Russia. Even worse...They refuse to do the deals in dollars. Syria and Iran got a mutual defense pact. It isn´t 100% about (the control of) oil and gas but it is certainly a big part.