Even IF 2 CB's go, we still have 4.
If you want to start assuming, which is fair enough, you'd have to assume that actually Bacuna is a RM. that only leaves Hutton. That is absolutely scary.
Yes Richards CAN play there, but at this stage there's no indication of that, in fact it's been stated he's a CB. Crespo, essentially same deal. Looks more a CB than a RB to me, don't you reckon?
I take your point about signing a starter who can walk into the team at CB, but surely, obviously, one of those is more needed at RB?
The only assumptions I made were that the press links to Baker and Cissokho leaving may be correct (being a speculation thread I didnt think assumptions would bother anyone). My comments were based on the information available. There are various reports saying Crespo is an FB so no, he doesnt look more of a CB to me.
http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/jose-angel-crespo-aston-villa-9736249
http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/jose-angel-crespo/profil/spieler/37397
I agree Bacuna is a RM but that doesnt leave only Hutton. If Hutton was injured we could use Crespo or Richards at RB as both are accomplished in that position. So its my opinion that a CB is a higher priority due to that fact that we have 4 players that can play RB (3 of which have been making a career of it) but our CB's consist of Okore & Senderos (both injury prone) Clark (no problems) Richards (unproven in this position) and Baker (probably leaving).
Opinions vary