Jump to content

fightoffyour

VT Supporter
  • Posts

    10,114
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    6

Everything posted by fightoffyour

  1. I think "mon" means "man" but I don't think "och" means anything.
  2. You won't enough money from Randy Lerner to get the better players the club needs... The new people understand the situation, that more money is needed,
  3. Lay off Mendi or another ITK will be kwan
  4. **BREAKING NEWS** I can confirm there are more than 3 chairs set out in that restaurant. Dale Stephens, Jermain Defoe and Kwan.
  5. Nope, Enda gave the name Mike Illitch at about the same time that Kwan posted last night, so there was a bit of crossed wires. Kwan didn't give a name though.
  6. New owners tomorrow evening instead then
  7. All the 'ITKs' are getting slated. In fairness that Dinkleham kept saying the 14th. Who knows, we could have a statement of sale on Wednesday. We could equally have nothing for a long time...too early to say anyone was wrong though
  8. The date that was mentioned a while back was Wednesday 14th May. Still hopeful that this is the first statement actually announcing that we are for sale and that a buyer is lined up and a takeover can happen very soon. Seems logical to announce the sale and have a bit of a farewell statement before the new owners come in.
  9. Bullshit. You can't be in work already
  10. Cheers for posting. It might be bollocks, but you did say what you heard. This is thread is purely speculation anyway. Not sure why people are getting on your back, they don't have to listen. Not saying I believe it, but it's all just rumours and I'm all for a bit of speculation.
  11. I haven't watched it, but if he sounds resigned to be off then couldn't it mean that new owners have a new manager lines up immediately. It's a bit different to allow this (off the top of my head, Hughes staying on at City) but he respects that Lerner has allowed this... Literally could mean anything, or nothing though. Not long til we find out for sure
  12. The away kit mockup with that fit could be amazing
  13. He should know that if he plays and we get spanked that it's not his fault. Might not work that way of course, but he should know that we're probably going to get spanked anyway. Therefore I hope he plays. And of course that we don't get spanked after all.
  14. Is that a reel of all our goals this season?
  15. We don't have to play the same formation. The next manager probably wont
  16. is there no position between DM and attacking mid/No.10 ?? Maybe CENTRAL MIDFIELD would work for him.
  17. If there is a record to be made then you can be sure Lambert is working hard to achieve it. Made me laugh
  18. He very much is a defensive-midfielder by his own admission. Anybody who says otherwise doesn't know what they are talking about. Shouldn't a defensive midfielder be good at tackling? Yes but because he isn't good at this doesn't change what position he plays in. A striker should pose a goal-threat but that doesn't mean that Heskey therefore wasn't a striker. haha thanks for that
  19. Someone remind me what's needed.. *please don't
  20. Still can't see Fulham winning their last 2. They are down there because, believe it or not, they have been worse than us so far this season. Stoke and Palace have nothing to play for, besides prize money, but thankfully they are the sort of teams/managers that won't roll over. Stoke don't give much away at home and the likelihood is that Fulham will fail to win there on Saturday and they will be out of the equation with regards to us.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â