I have to type my post out again because, well, I have to.
But what you are doing is using a straw man fallacy.
Your initial standpoint was that it is ‘literally’ in Iran’s constitution to wipeout all Jews. You then posted a conveniently truncated version of article 14 to ‘prove’ your point.
Even this truncated version did not prove your claim in the slightest.
When a full version of the article 14 is posted, proving you wrong, you then argue a completely different point - this is where the straw man comes in. You changed the argument from the literal existence within the Iranian constitution to wipe out all Jews, to the fact that the Iranian regime is guilty of this.
These are two completely separate claims here.
1. That the Iranian constitution ‘literally’ calls for the ethnic cleansing of Jews
2. The Iranian government is/was carrying out the ethnic cleansing of Jews.
Point 1 has been disproven.
Point 2 was not disputed.
You are using point 2, to argue point 1.
I.e your classic ‘straw man’
This is NOT semantics. This is a debating tactic that is used frequently, and has been employed persistently by the western media during the current conflict for propaganda purposes.
I would appreciate it if you would withdraw your false claim that the ethnic cleansing of Jewish people was ‘literally’ in the Iranian constitution - this is a lie, and you are spreading disinformation.
Posting truncated versions of articles to suit your agenda and support your narratives is not ethically sound. I guess you got it from Wikipedia. I suggest in future, to prevent misunderstandings, you go directly to the source you are quoting.
If you want to make your claim that the Iranian government are/were/will carry out the ethnic cleansing of Jews under the veil of article 14 by making false charges, be my guest. You won’t have an argument from me. It’s a disgusting practice when Iran do it, and it’s a disgusting practice when Israel do it, and it’s a disgusting practice when the US use their anti-terrorism laws to hold people without charge for decades in Guantanamo bay.
Misusing the constitution is NOT the same as your claim.