Jump to content

Czarnikjak

Established Member
  • Posts

    731
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Czarnikjak

  1. Problem is that our wages and amortisation are going up as fast (if not faster) than our revenue. This can be seen looking at our operating losses not reducing since we were promoted. So for a foreseeable future we are stuck with having to sell for profit.
  2. We are not ****, we've been in situation for many years now. Basically our wages and amortisation are too high for the revenue we generate. You fill the gap by selling stuff for big profit. We kept being complaint in the championship by selling the stadium and in last few years by selling grealish. We will stay complaint by selling somebody else. Nothing new really.
  3. I don't think that makes any difference to last seasons accounts that we are waiting for.
  4. I would argue that there's enough officially released information out there already to draw conclusions (Google latest uefa report about clubs finances). Either way, we will find out all the details soon, last year the accounts were published on the 3rd of March funnily enough, so it won't be much longer.
  5. Quiet before the storm...still a lot of people here burying their heads in the sand.
  6. No. And we already bought in a left back that will be integrated into the squad in the summer.
  7. Some numbers are out in public domain already and they don't make for a good reading. Latest Uefa club financial report has us posting £118m loss for last season and our wages up to £191m which is 92% of £214m revenue (wages alone, without amortisation!). We can add profit on player sales to that £214m but it won't be huge amount for last season.
  8. I just read that Uefa report you mentioned and it scared me. Our wages jumped by 38% last season from £139m to £191m. We had extremely high ratio of wages to revenue. Based on that, I would expect player sales for big profit ( someone with zero or low net book value) before we can bring someone in. And apparently we made a loss of £118m! Doesn't bode well for this summer. All this rumours about selling JJ might have to come true.
  9. I don't know. Perhaps they have some agreement with UEFA to provide them with high level figures for all clubs. Our accounts would have been signed off for a while now as we had to share them with premier league and uefa for FFP calculations. Anyway £214m is good...I was expecting something much closer to £200m
  10. Latest Deloitte Money League has our revenue for last season at £214m. I wonder how they know, our accounts have not been published yet, unless they have early access…
  11. How the hell they managed to increase the Match day revenue by £10m without ticket price increase? Their hospitality/corporate must be well ahead of ours if they can essentially generate double the match day revenue of ours with only extra 10k seats...
  12. Talking about increasing revenue, look at just published Newcastle figures for last season (that's before they got any CL money). £70m revenue increase....this train is departing quickly and we ain't catching it.
  13. No, all sources I've seen agree on £3m per year. Perhaps £10m in total for 3 years. From Adidas more realistic would be around £10m going upto £15m if we qualify for CL. No chance in hell we will getting anywhere near £30m. Spurs are getting £30m currently after years of qualifying for Europe and much larger world wide following than us.
  14. Our Castore deal worth £3m per year is pretty decent if you compare it to mere £90m Adidas pays Man Utd every year not sure why we would want to change
  15. NSWE pumped in another £130m into the club in December. So looks like we are still not sustainable without cash injections. The price to compete at the top is high!
  16. Last time we tried to calculate our ratio here it was around 80-90%, but this is with high degree of uncertainty. Yes, player sale profits also count, last 3 year average of your player sales goes towards the cap calculation. Grealish sale just dropping off that calculation was probably the main reason for selling Archer and Ramsey. Swiss Ramble is an authoritive source for me, you can take anything he writes is factually correct.
  17. We are not constrained by Premier League P&S that much. Bigger problem is UEFA salary cap, we are constrained by that now as we play in Europe. Having said that, I would expect focus in January to be selling people like Chambers and Traore (if possible at all), and reassessing in the summer when we know which competition we will be playing next season.
  18. Last released figures were £178m. Around March figures for last season will be released. Will struggle to hit £200m for that period (obv I'm not counting player sales). We gonna get around £14m boost for higher league placement, few extra bob for higher ticket prices, there was no major new commercial deals last season...all in all, maybe we will scrape £200m but i doubt it.
  19. Essentially yes (although I'm pretty sure once the actual work gets the green light and goes ahead you can recapitalise previous expenses and essentially "claim it back" from profit and loss perspective). In Everton case costs prior to June 2021 were expensed on the profit&loss account, I think that was the time when they were given the green light to go ahead with the build. If you're interested in Everton finances this Blog has you covered https://theesk.org/2022/05/30/evertons-financial-position-entering-the-summer/
  20. They could, but only after they received build permit you can start capitalising these costs. Any preliminary work before you get the the neccasary permits was counted towards ffp.
  21. Maybe they are low because they DO press high, not giving opposition even the chance to get caught offside. We don't press high and thus encourage long balls over compressed middle of the pitch. Risky strategy playing high line without press.
  22. Gerrard had no clue what he was doing and Purslow had massive ego. Both paid the price for their poor judgement, unfortunately it did cost us a lot of dough.
  23. Yup, even if it's just the salary off our books it's still worth it, as it looks like that was the best offer we got for him. Still better than paying him £135k every week.
  24. He could be a good company to other injured players in the treatment room.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â