The poll is irrelevant, but that'd be a completely different issue, agree to disagree.
Well, it's not because it provides a sample with no real bias allowed. 31/73 not only thought he wasn't the worst player on the pitch as you suggest, but that he was actually the best.
I meant because it doesn't take into account why people voted for who they did, who watched the entire match and who has unnecessary bias opinions towards certain players.
Edit: I'm not one of those...promise!