So if you have a different opinion you must have "an agenda"? Grow up.
I'll thank you to not resort to insults
No people can have a different opinion as much as they like, and expect to demonstrate that opinion without being insulted.
However, there is clearly an anti MON stance on here which is trying to be defended in the faceof facts. A defence which is also reverting to saying Pullis is a better manager, clearly not taking into account the factsof the case
That for me is an agenda, not a difference of opinion. I think there is also a pro-MON stance on here, depending who you talk to.
I don't rate MON. That isn't a fact it's just my opinion. I didn't "revert" to saying Pulis is better, I just rate Pulis more. Please explain how rating one manager over another counts as having an agenda? Pulis has a far worse track record as a manager than MON, so the puzzle about exactly on what basis you rate him higher is still there.