would suggest that the original is perhaps a bit too basic and not entirely accurate.
I'm sure that to present the true cost or otherwise of the monarchy, hundreds more factors would need to be considered on top of those featured in both videos.
Fundamentally though, in my opinion, the moral objections to the monarchy that are touched on towards the end of the response video, eg. royal privileges, "subjects" vs. "citizens", separation of church and state, stand regardless of any monetary issue.