I'm a Labour member so naturally you'd expect me to disagree with the decsions today, and I do over there pace, impact etc
But thats been debated.
So Tory's here's my question to you.
Up until Lehman Brothers the Torys supported Labours spending plans, infact wanted to increase public spending. It only differed once the banking crisis, where seemingly the Torys would not have saved the banks and created this above safe levels of a defecit we now have, where as Labour (and IMO) correctly increased public spending to save us from the collapse of banks.
So what was the right decison letting the market collapse when the banks failed, which is what the Torys would have done, or saving the banks as Labour did but now having to tackle this defecit?