TRL

Christ I really am THAT good! Did you see what I did here? All hail me, all hail me

What was he thinking?!

I remember last year when a fella from VT entered the game and our VT channel. We ended up ignoring him because he was an attention seeking clueless annoying dick. You know the sort who try to be funny, but just fails. The sort who expects to get people annoyed by craving attention and chatting for the effect. Oh how we laughed. The amount of jokes we had on behalf of that sad person. So sad.

I raise you with

Just read the the WotLK would have launch around 15th November. Some idiot claimed he worked on a gaming store and knew shit. Personally i think he is full of it, but what do you think?

The hardest natural material we have, diamond, contains the same chemical build up as graphite. Graphite is for instance whats in your pencil.

:wink:

Liar

Ditto. Didnt vote at all because im not sure you mean what you enjoy the most or what you find the best footballing wise.

You did in the Murphy thread. So in one thread there is no need to adress the press. But in this one you criticise MON because he hasnt done enough work. Something you wouldnt know UNLESS he addressed the press. Contradiciton.

You kinda contradict yourself though Nick. You accept we arent a PLC anymore and will do business in silence if we wanna. Its a private company right? So how would you know he hasnt tried hard? Do you need to become a media circus to be trust worthy?

You need to stop mate, your brain will explode soon

Probably pass the practical part, but i think i would fail the theory.

You should try Warcraft! Indeed Remember the journey from LHC to Silithus. Seriously those who havent done it dont understand the **** size of the game.

I kinda like 1 and 3, so either of those. But if a designer would like to edit number 4 i think it could become a bit better. Just make the lion simple one coloured. Same goes for the trophies really. Make it in the same colour as the lion and let it fade together. Possibly the same white colour as the star.

I know what you mean, they're all suggesting signing attacking players like Arshavin & Crouch. Even the fans can't tell they need a defence :!: Some of them even think they could get Berbatov. Yes thats what i read. One post listed Rafael van der Vaart, Huntelaar and some other fella, and that was in a thread called " realistic targets"... **** idiots

Ive been reading on some Newcastle forums now and its quite amazing. Seriously do it. Go have a read now. Read the posts about their expectations, new manager, new players and where they actually should be on the table. Jesus **** christ.

Young. Not that losing NRC, Barry, Gabby wouldnt be a blow, but Young is just instrumental.

First.

Heh. Me beeing a priest had fairly little to do with it. Reason i got the nod was the fact that Gaiana knew me along with the rest of the No. crew. You should just thank me for getting you useless English inside a proper guild.

494

Thats fair enough and i think most people get that pretty fast. But what happend before it, or what actions did take place is hardly meaningless, in fact its probably the most interesting question in the world as we know it (for some atleast). The creation of something from nothing is insane. Yet. Saying now what people have said the last 2 thousand years and constantly been proven wrong.

You could start by reading some of the links in this thread From the Hawking video - asking what is outside the universe is like asking what is further south than the south pole - it's just meaningless. If you read my earlier links, you will find that matter (which is energy) can be created out of "nothing". It is very rare, but you are dealing with enormous numbers. I wouldn't expect a school science teacher to be able to talk knowledgeably about this stuff. If you want to, you have a lot of reading ahead of you. Have they backtracked on the laws of physics then, cause isnt one of the fundamental laws of energy the fact that, energy in a system is constant but can be transferred from one form to another. Which link do you mean btw. cba looking through. Hawking does take a stand that there is and was nothing. Meaningless to debate it like you said. BUT he is very vague on the questions surrounding the Big Bang and exactly how it did develop itself. Fair enough that maybe he chooses his methods with a regard to his audience, and you need an above average idea of quantum mechanics to comprehend, but even then, to creative something from nothing.. good luck That is and will be the major problem cause you cannot expect people to agree that something can be created out of nothing.

If you really are interested you should pick up some from Hawking cause some of his stuff is very good and more importantly easy to understand. Its easier to understand it then actually accept it.