Danny_Villaman84

no worries about this, NeilS.

yeh, every day people learnt new thing. ;-)

((double post))

sound right descibes about them, Jack - Lockpicking and suspire them with trick,and bad day - jack is red handed or know he is do and counter to him.. your right he rare show in past but he is get us dangerous position free kick and push to close box regular but ref not helpfully as he think jack get down soft or dive which he is not on purpose get down easy (yet it is does look like he did) onomah break door and they frozen, boom them up in good day. and onomah fail break door and try break down not work as door were lock in correct way, he give up in on bad day. agreed Jack need to proof he can consistent,challenger onomah from bench, or give onomah "rest", if decide play him, that would cost our form. jack need bench also o'hare need in bench as both different type to play in "static" ACM, O'hare is better potenital in static ACM that Jack sorry to say this, Jack is better off play in left winger (inside forward) or free roles in ACM. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- off the topic ; I hate loan system be fair as allowed other club developed player better, useless there have right to buy for fee fixed (Only if he good play for us, and sensible price that buy him if poor for us let him go end of season or terminal during season to save wage and loan fee), if clause with not fee including - i prefer play jack or o'hare over onomah. I will be fair on him; onomah help us to win so far, not fair drop him for jack. Jack were injured, Onomah did great for us and why drop him for jack to make ourselves lose for our player (not spurs) which is gambling which not worth take risk. If win it is worth gambling but i trust him to win for us? No onomah has play imo.

Hey Neil S - i am from born Chester, England and British generation (half Welsh and half English with Irish background). yet your are correct - not first english languague - it is BSL this reason - grammar is change rules in BSL. like - "You(r) Name, What?" rather What is your name? what I actually need to do, written bit more practice to improve myself English grammar rules, yet AVFC is my passion support.

Ulloa is very good sign as loan in my option, better that Gayle. on paper: in my POV:- if we play sit and counter attack Bruce style: that Gayle good sign better option that Ulloa, yet i not fans of him yet he can bring score in forward, better that no score forward. if we push them forward and play closer to opponent box that Ulloa is better option.. Ulloa is will more dangerous play if Grealish because Ulloa good poacher in box "fox in the box" and good movement, still better option that davis, but he will bring ball to floor to pass around? no, that problem. other option is buy striker if we sell Ross and Hogan, Gabby to fund for buy "NEW" - Deep-lay forward who will move to villa it is will hard find. but we need BUY left back too. Yet better 2 players you names better that nothing. i am try think name who play in HULL under bruce, who he loan from asrenal. what his names? is he avaliable as i impressive him when he play under hull might good option as Bruce know him and he play better under him.

big problem if want play grealish on pitch, you need play 4-2-3-1"Narrow" as left winger cutter in. which we will be very good team, i believe that davis will less effective, i not think good idea so that play hogan that is better option but he is not "IN" form and poor which give us more problem...for right side so snodgrass is better canadiates to play this roles which, meant Albert have to drop for it which is bad move too as he is key in our wide man and he bring goals to us mean grealish have to drop for albert in left winger. Shall we changing winning formation even in poor style "IF" we change attact playing style which could cost our position in table and winning by play 4-5-1 which is gambling, i think best play off to safe route - 4-5-1 unfortune which Grealish could play in Onomah roles.. or O'hare will better option that Grealish in CM/ACM roles. which is big problem .. if albert injury ((Touch wood)) or need save him by sub him or before the match... that option might worth to play for yet Davis wouldn't effective useless we have pass to full back and cross for him useless we find Deep lay forward style (pace and "Can" dribbling yet TEAMWORK, good passer, intel to use bring team to forward by pass and move) but who!?! mean have money spent find this type forward. Bruce will buy this type forward - NO, NO CHANCE!

sound like that i am create huge debate between Conor and Albert for POTS. I agreed Albert is goals and assist more that Conor yet, Conor is one most influnce in Centre Midfield which make team tick and hard to beat because conor is full cut all grass on the pitch, and he is make team better which key in midfield which we was lack in last season which he not play much, and lansbury is not balance player as his better job in attack and not support backline that why it is were BIG gap in midfield last season. Conor is awareness area that why he go attack right time and protection backline, pair with Whelan or Jedinak make conor play have to chance play in attack roles, i think conor is quiet because Omonah play in advanced roles so Conor sit balanced to drag to give Omonah to space to make open to pass and attack that reason Omonah play some games great, that reason i see conor is key in midfield with better defensive mind rather lansbury. ((off topic if Conor injury (touch wood) i prefer see Hayes play his roles that Lansbury)) reason i pick both in frame POTS Albert is ahead conor and conor not far behind, because season not yet finish with other 5 months to go, also plenty games to play for. Albert is was on form from start of season, bruce drop him for his play elmo, which we not got score from winger, until bruce bring him back and he play exact what villa missing from start, he is reason we win most of the games. which credit to him push himself show bruce he is wrong and player good and improve his weak area (left foot) to become dangerous winger. Adama was left i was distaught with this decide because can see his potenial in right winger, and not sure what albert will bring to us in end. I was wrong and it is "BEST" swap villa has deal recently. Albert goals vs QPR was brilliant excuted goals, hope see more from him to end of the season.

possible one of them or both, i will looking in these later.

for me young player of the season : - Davis (race with omanoh) player of the season : - Adomah (race with Hourihane) if Davis score goals that he is win both Young POTS and POTS. i wonder when last villa player win both Young POTS and POTS?

if Bruce cant stop or change, or carry on the same stuff , so best way is fired him right now and replace who manager "CAN" change the team to better - will solve the first problem.. what i see bruce problem he not playing - player not play their strength THAT what the problem at moment. that what players squad he HAS in currently have to deal it until his player come in . good manager can deal it and adjust to these squad which bruce not.. if second problem still same "players" who cant play the manager way even manager play their strength - this meant player need to go, and manager need find player who is suit's style manager way .. it is manager job to find one, players that problem is manager who sign fail to play his style so meant to he is wrong buy player - manager fault. bruce been give 2 transfer windows and still same problem, so he is the one problem especial winter transfer he is spent "LOAD moneys and don't fix his tactical and player not suitable his style" that reason he is not good and cost LOAD our money and FFP is mess cos these windows transfer! hourihane is football type and lansbury is football type, Onomah is football type yet bruce is bypass the midfield and rely forward it is waste time to buy player, hogan is football type, he is waste money because bruce sign him as target man and not suit this roles when kozak or gestuse could play fit in bruce style. i don't idea what bruce try teach them in training, i think important training is what tactical and focus it, and improve it, learn mistake, with better coaching who understand manager tactical and teach players to manager style.. what i see, the player look like lost and, and not learnt it mistake and improvement and same problem go on go on go on. that might signal need new manager and know what to do.

Bruce need STOP to do changing winning formation and positve football to loser formation and negative football, and which he is rely on sole player (kodija) which we need learn without him. for example:- last season we were winning dec to jan in 433 formation and bruce decision change to 352/451 deep - what happen next? we are lose feb to april even kodjia play few games 3-5-2 / 4-5-1 (left winger) and he got injured and bruce decide we change to 433 and winning start again in may which too late for me. ** this season he DID same problem, we play winning load games by put opponent pressure and he played hogan and hourihane their strength which is go forward and play in opponent area to have to score the goals ..... what did happening.. it is working.. ie hourihane hat trick is happen closer to opponent box and play positive football style, and he score long range and score inside, hogan was same. ** bruce, he revert to long ball which hogan struggle do it useless with davis he might can cope but both never together on the pitch same time... and hourihane kept bypass by long ball to davis which make opponent more time to close our midfield to easy track to stop us to goal. why, why, why bruce, dropping these type of the football, and revert to play deep and negative football which been proofed that it is "NOT" working by last season and this season. what happen hogan? he don't score anymore, what happen to hourihane he not effective as before. he insist this formation and style is his winning method which not right. for me Bruce need go or willing to returned changing back to winning formation and style even not his strength and style... "Tough \ hard luck" him, he will learn it and adjustment, adopted it and he will become be good manager be fair if do this way. if he won't back to these way and he know where door, or wise kick his butt out of the door.

Bree, is not his fault to poor player, last game - it is not fair to blame on him because, 3 reason * he is 19 years old, he is have much to learn, and need more games to improve his form, he need play regular NOW and give him chance like 5 games or more to become better form or worse who know we need protection him as 19 years old. * he is not play his strength - drop deep and dig defend, unexperience which not his strength, his strength is go forward and support midfield, can defend when only right time and less pressure (cos young) which he is big potenial for right back for me. *mainly fault is actually is bruce - because he DIDN'T play on player strength - Bree is strength is go forward, and make team go pressure forward and he is quick can defend in short time (ie not consist pressure in back line) and bruce the one is who let team down be fair due his tactical and didn't play player strength. if drop bree would be harsh as bruce is play hutton which is WORSE that Bree, and kept play him for many games and bree got one games to prove and he is did poorly but still better hutton, if replace RDL i will did not mind it and be honestly with it, I BELIEVE RDL will same struggle as we sit deep and dig in, and let midfield (well long ball go over the midfield) and forward to score. this need change. this reason our full back not have capacity to defend under pressure,,why we sit back when our full back cant handle it that team will stability to break down don't look strong. for example:- "rhetorical question": ((it is like man push you and bully you all day and you have stood stay, and try stand all day as you been told ( manager Bruce ) to do not push returned back to bully, let him bully him all day and you try stood same shape, in end bullying will makes you collapsed due tired and mental pressure that why our full back is kept poorly and couldn't got energy to push when you need)) my answer to this solve problem is push them back (pressure them) even when stood and firm and quick push - (counter attack) and make them lose balance and we could advantage these to use attack better. - Bree and RDL will be good in these i am sure this.

agree, as he is our two "best" RB along RDL too. Bree is nod ahead that RDL at moment as he deserve first choice at moment. it is good to have a two different type RB to optional, depend tactical or opponent weakness to exploit. Bree is good football than RDL and can cross nice, as he can passing good, kept ball for team, rather give away and play safe. RDL is very good with pace to beat defence with his pace and to free space to played in box to create a chance. Hutton is 3rd choice RB, and I am hope Hutton not back walk in first team after today.

why is he good sign for me; these reason. Snodgrass would be good player left winger in 442 or 4411 as we don't have LEFT foot in left midfield. Snodgrass would be good player right attacker if we play 433\4231 as he will destory defence with his cut in ability and killer pass. Snodgrass would be good Attack Midfield if need cover Hourihane, he can long shot and killer pass to feed (hogan to finish off or 1-2-1 with davis, or both 1-2-1 and killer pass with Kojida)

Sorry if it is start with negitives, Villa play in first half is poorly, yet it is bruce fault as he changing tactical.. why have to be changing? as we go to playing with 3 back line when we were winning 2 games in rows. it is bruce twice, we could stick to back four, and play bree in right back. ((hope bruce play him - bree as first choice RB - as bree was very good tonight)) hope we never see hutton again.... as RDL and Bree is brilliant last week and last tues. Baker is very good player, i am still angry why we sold him, his defence style which we lack - winning aerial and winning tackle, better that our centre half. --------------------------------------------------------- Positive notice:- We is better play in second half - thanks god, if we playing the same style as first half; we could be lose. Samba injurying to force Bree come or Bruce changing to off him i don't know exact what happening yet it is helping us alots as we changing to a plan b to play for attack rather intive to pressure on us. Davis is really good today even not good as last week, he is ACTUALLY to help us to generate attack thought by his first touch pass, holding ball, flick ball to player to more advanced to attack position which help us lots. he is key player in forward line. if we play hogan as lone striker we could not play good position to attack, Would play with Hogan pair him but we should give up onomah or Hourihane for play hogan with Davis? No i would kept him play as lone striker. Onomah is superb today ! what a player we have, yet luck deflect goal to help us to draw. I am really hopefully we kept him in end of the season. ----------------------------------------------------- hopefully our next games line up: ---------------------Johnstone---------------------- Bree--------Chester-------Terry------Taylor ------Onomah----Whelan----Hourihane------- ----Snodgrass--------Davis--------Abomah----- Sub: Steer, Samba, RDL, Elmo, Hayes, O'hare, Hogan.

Murat Yakin is very good shout.. i like him, he is very good manager with injury and stars left club and still manage great, and great mind in tactial that what we need..

If RDM sack i will felt like we prone to un-mature for sack early for me yet he were wrong person to manager for villa from start, i am alway fans of Ralf Rasgnisk at moment he become manager so too late for it... usefully website for see who is available manager. http://www.transfermarkt.co.uk/trainer/verfuegbaretrainer/statistik we should try :- André Villas-Boas as he left zenit last summer we offer him second-chance in low level might help him to re-track his career, and long term goal - champions leagues as Dr Xia wanted. Marcelo Bielsa (were my first choice before RDM so still should go for him) Rudi Garcia Quique Sánchez Flores (Currently manager in Espanyol) Frank Rijkaad

when i watch match yesterday, I notice what our style suit us is passing around also pace for counter attack, so we need selection like these line-up to fix our style and system we need sign 3 players in january to more strenght our style and push to promotion. (RB - more like Amavi but right foot and CM - more like Raul Meireles or Joe Allen type, and CH who is quick Centre-half to sweeper type while baker and (chester or tommy) to header. -------------------------------Gollini------------------------ De Leat---Chester/Tommy-----Baker-----Amavi ------------------Tshobla----------Jerd--------------- -Abomah--------------Grealish----------------Ayew ------------------------Kodija------------------------ ---------------------------------Gollini------------------------ De Leat---Chester/Tommy-----Baker-----Amavi -----Tshobla------New CM/Grealish/Mcommack-----Jerd------ --------Abomah-------Kodija------------Ayew----- --------------------------Gollini------------------------ --------Chester-------Tommy-----Baker-------- (swap one with new CH) De Leat------Tshobla-----New CM-----Jerd----Amavi -------Abomah-----------Kodija----------Ayew--------- as we good in fast attack and pressure them in their box like we did in 45 mins, if they not work so put Gestede for extra pressure in box (Only work if we push them into their box). these tactical are very work well in match which we success in latest.

this match we are playing not good enough, I would sub westwood for Tshibola and Baunca move to right wing back, and put abomah in right inside forward. Ie: -------------------------Gollini---------------------- -------Tommy------Chester------Baker------- ----------------Tshibola-------Jerd--------------- Baunca--------------------------------------Amavi ----------Abomah----Kojida----Ayew------- if not work, so change to 4-5-1 for last 25 mins Sub Tommy for Gestede -------------------------Gollini----------------------- Baunca------Chester-------Baker-------Amavi Abomah------Tshibola-------Jerd--------Ayew -------------------Kojida--------Gestede----------- Sub Baker for Tshibola is not bad shout. would better if push forward as 3 fast forward and pressure them, and hope force mistake to gift us, or counter attack will hit them hard with 3 pace forward.

What i see our problem, so far this season. we been playing formation = 4-4-2 so we should play Wide Ball Midfielder - like James Milner type in winger. for balance in defence (Track back) and attack build-up or possession, and can crossing into box, work hard winger. yet we dont have this type,what we see problem common our 4-4-2 system with ayew and grealish, adomah, Kodjia*(i prefer him stay centre forward) they in winger they player occassion like 4-2-4, seriously? some of them did sometime to do track back but that reason we often got no support from winger, and our full back struggle, it is flaw our 442 system. we need stop play this, as our full back is kept exploit so they not have choice to centre to protect box so opponent winger can roam inside with no challenge. if we play attack in wide we should play "3 man midfield" with anchor roles, and 2 centre midfield or box to box midfield 3 man can move to close to touchlane to cover full back whie our wide attack mind so we wont exploit our full back as we got support them (yet other side might but more time to track back and time recover to pressure, if they force to play switch. it is logical but we never play these tactical. so i think we should play 4-3-3 or 3-4-3 both is answer our current problem, if we play attack so stick to 4-2-3-1 make sure attack them all throught the match and make sure our wide man are track....

I'm just not sure about Sinchair - might be better on the bench ;) Sinchair only one who bang often when he draft in striker roles from wingers in occasion his goals tally prove it, if your not sure so swap to Ayew or Rudy in lone striker - if i honest I prefer Sinchair and Ayew, Rudy even Kozak over Gabby in Lone strikers.. Ayew or Kozak might Gabby to partner Rudy in 2 forwards. (Gabby is suit in 2-men forwards but i'm not fan of his play ability, his pace is more treat that his ability with ball in all areas he put pure luck cross in occassion)

Vs spurs we need good balance between defence and attack we will got chance win .. -------------------------Guzan--------------------- Richards-------Okore------Clark------Amavi --------Gana------Sanchez----Veretout------- Gil-----------------Sinchair--------------Grealish sub: Bunn, Lescott, Hutton, Westwood, Adama, Baunca Rudy. when we play creative players Sinchair often goals machines even he is not striker, he is great poacher type with creative, ie if he go winger and drag so 2 or 3 of them ( Gil, and Grealish, Gana, Veretout ) could can slip in box hope get goals in them. (or Sinchair play as striker he alway running right time and right place, intel awares around box for goal cos Gil and Grealish to tear defence use intel pass to sinchair or past players and give sinchair free space cos closed gil and grealish rather him) we need play gil and grealish as both is telepathy each other and flair is brilliant to watch, defence often nightmare when both on pitch even one of them gil or grealish "got bad day office" sub adama to fresh attack can change pace if need ... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Dont think Kev would do it formation so likely he go for 442. -------------------------Guzan--------------------- Hutton------Richards--------Clark------Richardson Baunca--------Gana------Veretout-------Amavi -------------Sinchair----------Rudy-------------- sub: Bunn, Lescott, Gil, Westwood, Adama, Grealish, Gabby (would prefer if Kozak in Bench over Gabby)

We should bring back Okore-Clark partner which is best partner last season. we play it as normal defence line Richards---Okore---Clark---Amavi (quickly defence as they push further and press them to retreat deep let Gil and Grealish tear them down in deep line that what our strenght at moment..., if they play counter attack, long ball so all our 4 is damn fast running especial Okore. we should be able cope it. with Sanchez-Veretout-Gana will add protect in backline with Veretout and Gana do Box to Box midfields roles Gil and Grealish free roles to creative attack with lone striker - Sinclair or Rudy. if need very strong defence so play. for strong team. Richard--Okore---Clark---Lescott---Amavi they will hard break down with Sanchez and Gana in front of it too. and Grealish and Gil attacker (with track back) front of Sanchez and Gana lone striker - Sinclair or Rudy. Seriously we need new Right Back who can attack and defence in equal as amavi did. (minus his mistake in occasion as he just new to premiership) i hope Sherwood go buy. I wish Tripper join us indeed spurs. if we have him and amavi we will got very good full back with balance equal attack and defence if we bring new right back so we able play richards take over lescott indeed in back 5 ,i would drop richards in back 4 for new right back. richards need load prove he can play this roles (centre half)..

With wider right position - Adama we will sort and opposite defence will got nightmare.