Jump to content
Just visiting?

Czarnikjak

Established Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    746

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Czarnikjak

  1. Czarnikjak
    Talking about increasing revenue, look at just published Newcastle figures for last season (that's before they got any CL money). £70m revenue increase....this train is departing quickly and we ain't catching it.
  2. Czarnikjak
    No, all sources I've seen agree on £3m per year. Perhaps £10m in total for 3 years. From Adidas more realistic would be around £10m going upto £15m if we qualify for CL. No chance in hell we will getting anywhere near £30m. Spurs are getting £30m currently after years of qualifying for Europe and much larger world wide following than us.
  3. Czarnikjak
    Our Castore deal worth £3m per year is pretty decent if you compare it to mere £90m Adidas pays Man Utd every year not sure why we would want to change
  4. Czarnikjak
    No. About 20mil is the maximum.
  5. Czarnikjak
    NSWE pumped in another £130m into the club in December. So looks like we are still not sustainable without cash injections. The price to compete at the top is high!
  6. Czarnikjak
    Last time we tried to calculate our ratio here it was around 80-90%, but this is with high degree of uncertainty. Yes, player sale profits also count, last 3 year average of your player sales goes towards the cap calculation. Grealish sale just dropping off that calculation was probably the main reason for selling Archer and Ramsey. Swiss Ramble is an authoritive source for me, you can take anything he writes is factually correct.
  7. Czarnikjak
    We are not constrained by Premier League P&S that much. Bigger problem is UEFA salary cap, we are constrained by that now as we play in Europe. Having said that, I would expect focus in January to be selling people like Chambers and Traore (if possible at all), and reassessing in the summer when we know which competition we will be playing next season.
  8. Czarnikjak
    Last released figures were £178m. Around March figures for last season will be released. Will struggle to hit £200m for that period (obv I'm not counting player sales). We gonna get around £14m boost for higher league placement, few extra bob for higher ticket prices, there was no major new commercial deals last season...all in all, maybe we will scrape £200m but i doubt it.
  9. Czarnikjak
    Essentially yes (although I'm pretty sure once the actual work gets the green light and goes ahead you can recapitalise previous expenses and essentially "claim it back" from profit and loss perspective). In Everton case costs prior to June 2021 were expensed on the profit&loss account, I think that was the time when they were given the green light to go ahead with the build. If you're interested in Everton finances this Blog has you covered https://theesk.org/2022/05/30/evertons-financial-position-entering-the-summer/
  10. Czarnikjak
    They could, but only after they received build permit you can start capitalising these costs. Any preliminary work before you get the the neccasary permits was counted towards ffp.
  11. Czarnikjak
    Maybe they are low because they DO press high, not giving opposition even the chance to get caught offside. We don't press high and thus encourage long balls over compressed middle of the pitch. Risky strategy playing high line without press.
  12. Czarnikjak
    Gerrard had no clue what he was doing and Purslow had massive ego. Both paid the price for their poor judgement, unfortunately it did cost us a lot of dough.
  13. Czarnikjak
    Yup, even if it's just the salary off our books it's still worth it, as it looks like that was the best offer we got for him. Still better than paying him £135k every week.
  14. Czarnikjak
    He could be a good company to other injured players in the treatment room.
  15. Czarnikjak
    Lol, you would rather keep him so he can spend another year on the treatment table while we pay £7m for this privilege?
  16. Czarnikjak
    Saudis or Qatari would buy anyone with only a passing resemblance to a footbal player...not sure Monchi deserves much credit for this one.
  17. Czarnikjak
    Barcelona signed Coutinho for a reason too. I don't think the fact that Barcelona signed someone 5 years ago has any relevance to their current usefulness for Villa.
  18. Czarnikjak
    So far the only idea Chris Heck shown is to flog fans via Terrace View...lets judge him by his actions not reputation from previous clubs.
  19. Czarnikjak
    We don't need replacement for the treatment table place, and if you talking about pitch he never is never fit Anyway
  20. Czarnikjak
    He is never available to play anyways, so him going makes no difference to our chances in Europe.
  21. Czarnikjak
    You would also get Digne amortisation off the books, not just his wages. So you saving annually 6.5m + 5m, even if you sell for no profit.
  22. Czarnikjak
    It's very different and quite simple. Your squad cost is allowed to be 80% of your revenue (this season, next season drops to 70%). Squad cost is sum of playing and coaching staff salaried plus amortisation. This is divided by your revenue with added profit on player sales (averaged over last 3 years.) So as our revenue is about £200m and average profit on player sales is about £40m, we can spend on wages and amortisation upto 80% of £240m, all ball park figures.
  23. Czarnikjak
    Correct. So Premier League ffp is not a limiting factor atm, but as we qualified for Europe now, we are also subject to the new UEFA squad cost control rules, which are very strict in comparison.
  24. Czarnikjak
  25. Czarnikjak
    We are not a top team in terms of wages though and we never will be. In our wage structure he is one of the top 3 earners and I would expect him to perform like that. Not just to be a bit part player like some people here are suggesting. If he can't deliver that (due to injuries or whatever else), we need to try to get rid of him.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â