Jump to content
Just visiting?

paul1984

Full Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    193

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by paul1984

  1. paul1984
    I think FFP aside they would keep Jack for 12 months to see if we go up so can offer him terms he can accept. I think if he doesnt go and we haven't done well in the league by January he will be gone for sure. But that is without FFP in consideration
  2. paul1984
    If we got Tuanzebe, Snodgrass and Abraham I would be very happy
  3. paul1984
    Nah he was British think his first name may have been Peter Edit this is the guy http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-5822633/Roman-Abramovich-rejects-approach-sell-Chelsea-Jim-Ratcliffe.html
  4. paul1984
    That's exactly what I think, debts should be to the owner and contract liabilities should be subject to some kind of guarantee if it is over what a club can realistically pay.
  5. paul1984
    The person who wants to buy Chelsea is like 3 times richer than Abramovic
  6. paul1984
    He's got good movement and pace too.
  7. paul1984
    Abraham would be a great signing looking at what he did last time in this league.
  8. paul1984
    WTF are you lot on about signing all these players for? We are still in a big hole on FFP and any noise that has been going on is loans for youth and nobody's.
  9. paul1984
    Theres no point keeping him if we don't go up this year as he wouldnt sign a new deal and be in his last year.
  10. paul1984
    You say that, I say that, MOST people say that. I just googled to see if there is a campaign to get rid of it.....and there isn't! Hows that even possible? Almost no one likes it and there's a campaign for anything these days.
  11. paul1984
    Why haven't we brought Mbappe, Neymar and Messi yet?
  12. paul1984
    nah it has to be spread over the life of the contract
  13. paul1984
    In
  14. paul1984
    well they are the new owners, they have a majority shareholding
  15. paul1984
    holding cleaning polish
  16. paul1984
    Don't forget to factor in the drop in parachute payments for this season.
  17. paul1984
    What do you know that the rest of us don't?
  18. paul1984
    I think that's a secondary issue, even if he has money it doesn't appear to have been headed our way.
  19. paul1984
    I'd say from the noise around the club that it's clear Xia hasn't been putting in his own money (he's allowed to put 13m a year into the club) without this it makes FFP much harder to meet so I have joined the Xia out crew.
  20. paul1984
    Pretty much this we can't know until march especially with the wild remarks in the press.
  21. paul1984
    It's Impossible that we are losing 60 million per year, that is more than the entire wage bill for the year in season where we recouped 15m more than we spent on transfer fees.
  22. paul1984
    So a new figure of 75 million to find.... suspiciously like that stupid 6 million loss per month that was parroted in the papers or the supposed 45m needed for FFP plus 30m investment figure...... God I wish we could see the accounts to get the actual truth the media is bloody useless.
  23. paul1984
    Lets face it this thread is pointless unless we know the financial parameters we need to meet via player sales and a drop in the wage bill for 'sustainability and FFP compliance'
  24. paul1984
    More like 55m!
  25. paul1984
    Yes
×
×
  • Create New...
Â