paul1984
-
Posts
193 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Downloads
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Media Demo
Store
Events
Everything posted by paul1984
-
Well it looks like it was watch out for Friday...... for nothing to happen ? Back to usual then what are we losing per year, how much have we lost in the three year period etc..... can't find out until the accounts come out in the spring..... ?
-
No.
-
Oh no, not more completely vague knowledge..... When people know something and they want to make that information public they can just put it straight out and not bollocks vague information
-
You are the one giving out vague ITK posts
-
No worries lads, we have been told to watch out for tuesday remember ?
-
So still no news other than someone on here saying look out on Tuesday?
-
So you personally have information? Care to share?
-
Nothing it was too cryptic to make a conclusion
-
Quite possibly
-
Has anything interesting happened yet?
-
Same old then.... I've no idea if we had 990 quid or 990 million and it sounds like we will never know.
-
link?
-
Huth wouldn't be the worst signing in the world on a 2 year deal but definitely no more. Ideally though whom ever we sign in that position should be able to keep pace with attackers so we don't absolutely HAVE to play a defensive midfielder in every game throughout the game. That situation becomes even more pressing if Chester goes, I also feel we shouldn't sell Elphick unless he is on very large wages.
-
I'd be happy to see him come back if the cost is right for us, I'm sure we can raise the money through sales for a low fee, ditto for Hernandez.
-
I wouldn't mind letting Jedinak and Whelan go, we have Thor, Lansbury and of course we can purchase someone one cheaper wages to play in the defensive midfield position who is more mobile.
-
How are we even debating possible signings when we dont know budgets for transfers, wages and who is going from the current squad?
-
No doubt but it firstly it isn't the fault of the current owner and secondly in our current predicament it really matters what the terms are to service it which we don't know.
-
Indeed and surely the point is what was the money for! for instance part of it is mentioned on this thread to pay an overdraft etc so its not new debt its shuffling chairs.
-
Well, at the end of our discussion I have deduced nothing from you. The media says we lost 14.4m last year I don't understand why you say differently. You say we borrowed 45m and pointed it out in part of the accounts which is fine but then seemingly try and make out like its 'new debt' rather than replacing old debts +14.4m. I've had an accountant before and it was always really simple so yea I'm afraid I am putting this down to 'accounting bollocks' like amortisation which is important for FFP but the rest of us are trying to find out the real position of the club aka profit/loss accounts.
-
Fine so its a real loss of 14.4m for the year with the rest of this 47.5m being financial reorganisation?
-
Alright lets try asking a few direct questions. Was the loss last year 14.4m? If so why has the club borrowed 45m?
-
alright 47.5m....... I'll be honest this sounds like accountancy bollocks to me at the moment rather than you brought in X and Y went out and the difference is 14.4m which is simple. I'm really not interested in amortisation, that's for FFP. Can you explain it more?
-
So its a 15 million pound loss for last year like reported yet we took out 45 million in loans....?
-
We'll see.
-
at this rate no ones going to know whats going on until march when the accounts come out
