paul1984

I meant in actual real terms of wages, player transfers, etc.

Care to explain what that money was for?

Yes

I clicked on the link and it came up with a list of lots of different clubs and figures, I assumed that was what you were linking. As for the cash flow statement, I wouldn't claim to understand that however I would point out it is for 2016/2017

Yep that's wrong too, its got wages at over 93m and the wage bill here is 45m at the moment and was 62m before the season ended.

Xia can put up to 39m into the club over 3 years.

Ok, except we know roughly what our outgoings are and it would require no where near that 4-6m per month to add to our income to cover the bills ergo even without FFP the stories are rubbish. Like everyone else, I know we are losing money but it certainly isnt that much per month

its 39 million over 3 years so 13 million per year. You aren't going to break FFP rules on putting money into the club to get fined/deducted points. IF you are going to put some money into the club and you have already gone over your 13 million you are going to do naming rights to the ground or something similar. the point remains you guys all know nothing about the financial situation as none of us do, you do however know the FFP rules so you know the stories of 4-6m per month being put in is rubbish, and lest we forget our expenses are about that amount per month, are we pretending we don't have an income now to confirm our biases?

Answering questions is cool FYI.

Again, has he? He is only allowed to put in 13m a year

Are we? Seen the accounts? Or are you listening to the papers who are proven to talk bollocks.

Is it a good thing? Neither yes or no, that's the point with paying early or in one go you get less money thats how the system works. As for Gil I havent heard of us getting his money early as we have only this month sold him.

I find the 11m amusing to be honest, its almost spoken about like ooo look how bad it is when in reality its very rare players transfers are paid for in one go and of course they never mention what is owed to us.

Well, that would depend on the clubs REAL financial position which none of us know. Tony brought the club knowing he had the extra income from parachute payments for three years, one assumes the clubs price is lower simply because 2 of those 3 years have passed by regardless of financial position.

Indeed. I haven't commented in about a week because frankly there isn't anything to comment on as there is no new credible information.

Why do people keep saying we are losing 4-6 million month? It's clear from last years accounts we aren't.

I saw the same exact story released by two papers at exactly the same time. If this exists then they should give some sort of substantive reason. So for example we have saved about 17 million in wages just by letting the loan players go and a few transfers..... is that included? How about the fee for Amavi? The Recon deal for the training ground etc. Its all airy fairy to me and for me to take it seriously I need some substance rather than a throw away line, they can be more specific if they have actual information.

Highly doubt it

Well, that was rude, I just passed on what I heard I didn't make out like I'm ITK. FYI it was made out it was the son of someone connected to the hierarchy either past or present. I guess you will find out tomorrow as the media usually reports when someone has a medical.

Don't take it as gospel but it wasn't someone seeking publicity I just overheard him telling a work mate. If true I wonder what the fee is, Spurs aren't known to pay well and a bidding war doesnt seem to have happened or we would have heard about it.

I just came back from getting a laptop of mine fixed and in the back I heard the owner talking to someone in there saying he spoke to someone who is the son of someone (didn't catch the surname but the first name was Sam) and he said that Grealish was going for a medical at Spurs tomorrow.

So a random twitter user..... ok lol

Then I shalt be taking it even 1% seriously

Can I have a link as some kind of proof to back any rumour

How long, if at all do you think it will take for us to know about information from today's meeting?