Is it really that hard to grasp? are clubs no longer allowed to buy for the future?
I'd hazard a guess if we brought him next yr for something like the money that Cornelius was brought in for around £9mill and he didn't make an impact, then you'd one of the first to slate the club for bringing in foreign over priced crap.
There were two strikers available from that league, cornelius and helenius. It turns out that neither were ready just yet. The difference is we didn't spunk £9mill on our striker. Got him in early to bed down and adjust.
Good business for me. Well, like I say, this "project" is beyond me. I can't understand why a player who comes to a premier league club isn't constantly banging on the manager's door to get game time - this is after all his big chance - and I don't see how what he's doing now (training with the squad) is preparing him for a future premier league career. If we're effectively treating him like an Academy player then getting match experience seems crucial and if he's not good enough to get it with our first team, he should go out on loan.
Still, I'll take your reassurance that it's good business and wait to see how the club benefits. It's really not that hard to understand. He turned down loan opportunities to train with the first team. Seems like a good idea to me, get acclimated. Previous posters have given you the example of Cornelius and how that turned out for Cardiff. For 1.2 I think it's a great bit of business and the fact that he's scored when given the opportunities has been the cherry on top.