Jump to content

avfc89

New Member
  • Posts

    1,171
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by avfc89

  1. Not that surprising really. He's saying very little, hasn't articulated any kind of credible alternative policy (ie, we'd be cutting too) and very few people realise he was a key advisor to Brown when labour were wrecking the economy. As long as he says very little then the unpopularity of spending cuts and tax rises the coalition are implementing should see his support rise. When there is an election and he has to come up with and articulate a plan, then it might be be so rosy for Labour. Jon, It amuses me how you blame Brown for the economy like he had control over a GLOBAL financial meltdown. And I also didn't hear David Cameron rejecting Brown's economic vision in the previous years. As for Ed, I agree he hasn't set out a clear definition of his intentions. And that is one of the reasons why I'm shocked by the poll; I can understand the Lib Dem failure, but the Tories projected result suprises me a lot.
  2. I'm quite surprised by that poll to be honest; I didn't think Ed would be in the lead at this stage.
  3. SSN also report that Norwich have refused Burnley permission to speak with Paul Lambert. WTF? He's too good for Burnley and reminds me of Moyes a lot. Could be an ideal, cheap replacement should GH leave. I agree. Lambert is a very promising young manager who will do well when given the chance at a bigger club in the top flight. He as done a great job at Norwich and did very well at Colchester and Wycombe. Leaned his trade in the lower leagues and done his apprenticeship and for me would be a very good appointment for us. Young and hungry for success. Mini-MON.
  4. Not as much as ud think How is that then? Because he's been abject in his last two jobs possibly? He was under financial restrictions at Ajax, and he had Hamburg at the top of the league for the first time in eight years. If Jol has been abject, then I wonder what you're are calling GH's job here.
  5. Not as much as ud think How is that then?
  6. Get Jol. The vast majority of supporters will back Martin's appointment as manager.
  7. **** right off, season ticket holder for 21 years, go to most away games - and its not a kneejerk reaction pal, feel free to check my previous posts on our chairman and even when we were doing well, i was always under the impression that it was just PR and bluster to keep the fans onside....... all stems from the Moscow debacle where he allowed (or told, for the conspiricy theorists out there) our manager to throw a competition - rocket polishers
  8. Pah! And David Cameron also guaranteed to keep EMA when visiting a college during the election and meeting students.
  9. We should get behind the whole club; and credit to the fans I believe they have done and will continue to do so. If we can get something against Chelsea it will be a huge boost for sure.
  10. :cry: Who cares? I have no interest in hearing his thoughts about our club. Gareth Barry was just employed by Aston Villa. He does not and never will embody the club such as the supporters; and it is very rare that any footballer in the modern day does.
  11. see I don't think so Thanks to hello magazine we have young girls growing up wanting to be like Katie Price ..and that is far far worse than anything Murdoch has ever done I thought the Tories were always big believers in the individual's choice; I guess not in certain areas
  12. I'm sorry Tony, I don't know how you've come to that conclusion. The BBC in comparison to Sky News is billion times balanced and that is all really.
  13. it so is , and always has been Rubbish. The BBC is more to the right and occasionally in the middle politically.
  14. In what way do you think the media should further the agenda of the British People ? Do you think the media really is that influential ? The BBC have been lefties since forever why can't someone like Murdoch be the yang to their ying ? Personally I'm more worried by the hello magazine types and the braindeads that follow trends that celebs come out with rather than something one of Murdochs new channels might broadcast The BBC isn't left.
  15. I'm loving your new found attitude towards the government. sigh , if you think a labour Govt would have blocked the deal then your are more deluded than Mr Deluded from Deludedshire or does being in Murdochs pocket from 97 - 2009 not mean anything any more ? I made no comment on that subject, and you're probably correct in your assumption. But remember this isn't a Labour government.
  16. I'm loving your new found attitude towards the government.
  17. so I keep hearing from those that aren't too chuffed that the coalition isn't pursuing left-wing ideologically driven policies though I suppose to be fair to Brown his massive tax and overspend into massive deficit was not ideological driven , it was greed driven, the greed to redistribute billions of poor taxpayers money to people like Fred Goodwin :winkold: It isn't surprising anymore that you use the previous government to support any unfair plans made by the coalition, so predictable.
  18. though they denied it all the way through the election campaign haven't the Hypocrite party now admitted that they would have also had to cut cut cut ? The Tories may be acting to fast , time will tell on that , but they are necessary This isn't necessary Tony. It is purely ideological and you know this very well; so stop trying to deflect the responsibility of YOUR party.
  19. This government is doing exactly what I expected them to do. What did people expect from the Tories? Other than cut, cut, cut. As for the Lib Dems, they should hang their heads in shame.
  20. avfc89

    General Chat

    Just let it go naturally and rest up.
  21. By-election Jan 13th. Time for the Fib Dems and Cons to go down.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â