I'm not sure why you think that he may be charged with an offence relating to a previous riot in Provo Utah would change any of the story in the Intercept article, quite frankly it's an irrelevance to what they were saying about him, it would be a footnote. I'm also unsure why you think this relevant but minor point turns the article into propaganda. They clearly say he organised the event and that a Truck driver was killed, whether he may or may not be charged with an offence in relation to that doesn't seem that major an ommission as from what has been said, it doesn't seem that he was responsible for that murder