Why?
David Attenborough fronts up an organisation formerly called the Optimum Population Trust, now called Population Matters, which is very concerned about the number of people in the world. They are concerned with climate change, and have come to the conclusion that the best way of combatting climate change is contraception. In particular, they want to reduce the population of developing countries, even though it is the population of the developed countries who have far, far more impact on global warming. They present their position as being about female empowerment, but it seems they want female empowerment if it means having fewer children in developing countries, rather than the right to choose whether large or small families suit them better.
Population Matters don't appear to be nearly as vocal about changing the gross overconsumption of resources in the West. They do list "limiting consumption" as one of their goals, but looking at the range of publications they put out, simple numbers of people is clearly far and away the dominant theme. Oh, and they are also vehemently against net immigration to the UK.
David Attenborough's a lovely chap. He makes great programmes about geckoes and things. He has a wonderfully soothing voice, and I could happily drift off to sleep while watching one of his excellent programmes. But I'm not sure he's the person I would turn to for advice on how the global economy should be run.
It's not so much the global economy, it's the global environment. You can't expect to educate people to give up on life's luxuries without them turning a deaf ear to it, but you can try and limit the number of children that people have. People on the planet naturally want to feel that there is equality amongst the world, therefore people in the poor developing world are going to want a western standard of living, hence why a lot of the net immigration into the western world is economic. David Attenborough, with his career spanning the length it has and the nature of work he does, is one of the best people to illustrate how the world on an environmental level has been adversely affected. The worlds population increases by the size of a new Germany every year, that is a huge figure and is accelerating the rate of environmental damage. Are you telling me there isn't an issue here? I'm sure you're not, what do you think the plan of action should be as an alternative?