Jump to content

MotoMkali

Established Member
  • Posts

    8,163
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by MotoMkali

  1. Yep half a second less on the ball per pass and we'd be way better
  2. No options for them further forward. This is the big difference between this game and the arsenal game. We can't get the ball into the space between their defence and midfield.
  3. Lille will be in the CL next season anyway. We jist need to improve our depth and hopefully avoid as many injuries. Often whoever seems like they have the msot energy is the team that wins these games.
  4. They've not threatened us in the past 20. We've just not provided any threat either except that lats Luiz shot.
  5. Doesn't help ref keeps letting them get away with blatant fouls
  6. Because every time the ball goes to cash it immediately destroys our attacks.
  7. 2 balls delivered to the correct place no one attacking them.
  8. Why can none of our players control the ball when it is in the air. And why are we playing so many loopy passes when driving it would be better?
  9. We look so terrible defensively. We might need to sub cash for Carlos before half.
  10. Zaniolo injured and the ref ignored it for a dive instead.
  11. Cash is actually so so poor. Every time he gets it we lose the ball
  12. Diaby needs to come short more often. Really missing the Rogers outlet especially with us playing cash at RB.
  13. No outlet because cash at RB. And Konsa isn't as comfortable on the ball as Carlos.
  14. Awful. Terrible by mcginn and cash left the crosser unmarked
  15. No Bailey starting is interest after not starting at the weekend.
  16. No you aren't understanding them. Of course the probabilities have a massive slide when an unexpected outcome occurs. If you have a 60% chance to win a game and you lose it. 60% of the previous calculation is written off. These calculations will basically be like running 10k simulations of the season, then saying how many times X happens. 1st the quality of teams obviously isn't 100% accurate, 2jd it's very hard to factor in matchups for various teams in football especially, 3rd its hard to evaluate a coaches ability to gameplan for an individual opponent. All these factors lead to the evaluation of quality being off a little bit before the simulation and then that compounds massively when you sre simulating a dose teams.
  17. Yes I know, my point is though, that playing him at RB would hardly be a bad decision unlike almost everything from Bruce's tenure.
  18. He's right footed. He's probably more naturally a RB than he is a LB.
×
×
  • Create New...
Â