No, when he joined under Ellis few knew he was part of some of the takeover options and his deification was made then when he joined and has stuck with some ever since and why not when you consider the options maybe available at the time.
I'd disagree, takeover talk was at boiling point when O'Neill joined, I think that many if not most saw O'Neill as an indication of a brighter future on the horizon, an arrow fired directly from God (Or Randy Lerner in this case) to smite the demon.
I think it's this feeling that inspired the hysteria that accompanied his arrival, he was Randy Lerners impending takeover made flesh.
By arriving first, he became the man that carried all our hopes of the bright new future and with that came the weight of our expectation. That expectation, I think was overly inflated not on our opinion of him as a manager but on our vision of him as carrying the future. In that scenario, it would be easy to see the start to his Villa era as an indiciation that he's not the coach we'd hoped. Having completed one miracle and removed Mr Ellis, it was easy to imagine that others would follow in sharp order.
Now it seems he's just a football manager managing a football team.
I don't see that as a failure on Martin O'Neills part. I think we have a Chairman who thankfully no longer believes in the Aston Villa managers three year cycle, it remains to be seen how successfully we as fans will adjust to that.
You certainly argue your point eloquently and with consistency, and it's good to see that whilst you didn't find your calling you haven't let those O levels go to waste, but it appears that on this subject we're starting from different positions, so I guess we'll have to agree to disagree.