Is Holman good at the technical side of his game? I think so, I think demonstrably so. I can pick out a few examples of when his technique has been excellent, such as the goal. Others think not, to varying degrees. I think that is unfair to varying degrees. This is the argument.
You have a problem with my use of the word castigate, but the strength of the word was obviously mitigated by what has been said in the rest of my post(s), that is obvious, and I've explained that. What more can I say to appease you?
I've no problem with debate, go right ahead I like a good debate, but it's courteous to read the peoples posts that you are debating with. But if you follow an irrelevant line of argument to the points being made it's frustrating for everybody.
Yes I lol'd is loling uncool or something?