We haven't been shafted at all. Just because his name is Darren Bent and not Redin Zukaku doesn't mean he isn't worth at least half as much as two strikers he's currently 1 goal behind in the Premier League scoring charts since 2005, which includes spending a proportion of that on the bench at Spurs.
If anything he's worth more than £18 million and if we have got him for that price then it's a bloody good deal.
If it gets to 24 million I don't care what anyone says, we have been shafted. Liverpool paid around 22 million for torres... anyway like I said I think bent would do well here and will score goals and i am not against us signing him
Bent and Torres have very similar records and Torres was purchased pre-Man City and nearly 4 years ago. Like I said, Torres sounds prettier.
Torres is also in a completely different league to Bent im afraid
Yep, such a lovely foreign name.
Read my other posts !! im not getting into an argument over torres vs bent because its just ridiculous. Im just stating that i think the fee is a little steep, im guessing you were extremely happy when we spent 8.5 million on NRC ?
and btw ill happily eat my words if he come here and plays like a 20 million quid striker, very happily
Why couldn't a reasoned debate be held about Torres and Bent? Is it because Torres iz wel gud on FIFA?
What does it have to do with NRC? I thought we vastly overpaid for NRC.
I think we will have overpaid for bent if this goes through.
Just a point about Torres v Bent, if they were both available for 20 million who would end up at the likes of Barca, Inter etc? ( the really big clubs)
Bent wouldnt be snapped up by Inter or Barca so we dont want him.
EH? Makoun wasnt wanted by them, but i want him, likewise Adam, Young, Milner etc.... have a word.