Witton_Lane

It will be anything but easy for him. It was piss easy for him :winkold: Won it behind his jab as I expected Shouldn't have been easy for him but it was strangely a walk in the park. I eagerly await his ducking of Maidana though Told you not to bet on him mate

Against a bum... The ref will apparently be this guy (acording to ESB) Good to know it's not a typical Warren ref I believe Christodoulou was the only judge that gave the first Lewis/Holyfield fight to Lewis... I wouldn't bet money on Kotelnik mate, he didn't look all that impressive to me when he beat Rees, who lets face it is crap. Khan will win this and no doubt go after the guy that beat Prescott to claim he's 'avenged' that loss :shock:

I'd like to hope you don't....but a lot of Klitschko lovers still believe that crap...or the 'diabetic incident' one, that was funny as **** too Here's hoping Kotelnik cleans Khans clock. **** me I think that's a tongue twister you know, try saying it fast :shock:

You laugh at that yet you believe Wladimirs excuses for his loss against Brewster? Both are equally ridiculous if you ask me....

Who the hell wrote that article, what a moron :shock: ALL fighters face 'weak' or 'hand picked' opponents in the early stages of their careers yes, but if those fighters are any good then they don't get knocked out in the first round by any of those, or dropped by notoriously feather-fisted opponents on the way. I hate Slappy Joe but comparisons between him and glass jawed Khan cannot be made, same goes for Hatton who was fighting hand picked guys yes but at least he was actually beating them without getting knocked down, apart from the Magee fight. I love how the Prescott loss is dismissed as a fluke too, just because Khan beat Barrera, what a load of shite. If it was a fluke then Khan should rematch him and beat him, like Lewis did with Rahman - but he won't because if he did he'd get starched again in exactly the same fashion. Picking on little old guys like Barrera is all well and good, same with Kotelnik who has never greatly impressed me. Here's the thing though, if he wants to be taken seriously at his new weight he's got to take on REAL fighters should he beat Kotelnik because at that weight there's plenty to choose from. I can't wait, personally because he's going to get hammered and exposed for what he truly is again - just like Hamed was against Barrera all those years ago

3 all the way for me, stopped supporting England after the disgraceful treatment Graham Taylor got when he was manager, supported Italy ever since, as it seems to annoy people.

Apparently Barcelona have played 61 games this season so the too many games excuse doesn't wash. Brown being fully fit is an irrelevence as he won't be first choice anyway, Berbatov won't settle because he's a lazy petulant tosser and Ronaldo will be gone, just as I predicted at the start of this season - his price went down by a few million last night, too Also if your team treats the Champions League final as a hindrance then you've got big, big problems. They didn't treat it like a hindrance at all they just got out-played by a far, far better side - and we all thoroughly enjoyed seeing it.

Got to admit "you're on sky sports" was amusing tonight, nothing but happy scousers and gutted cockneys calling in

I somehow doubt it. Chelsea and Arsenal will strengthen in the summer, as will Liverpool. You on the other hand are about to lose Ronaldo and the 30 goals a season he brings. His comments after the game seemed to me to be someone spoiling for an argument with a very stubborn manager in the hope he will be shown the door.

Liverpool won the champions league and finished 5th in the league, so were they best team in europe? Remember Ferguson whingeing back in the day when they got knocked out by Dortmund, because United were Champions the season before and Dortmund were 2nd he felt it was unjust that his side even had to play them. Skip forward 12 months, United win the Champions League after finishing 2nd in the League the year before, he says **** all - and gets knighted for his jamminess. You could write a book on this foul clearings in the woods hypocrisy, you really could.

Yea, lets see Stretford's reaction when he denies Man Utd 4 penalties It wouldn't be his reaction I'd be looking for to be honest, it'd be Ferguson doing a Jock Stein that would leave me pissing myself laughing. The thought of the biggest cheat in football meeting his maker whilst blowing his top over a bad decision is one that fills me with joy

I hope they give that referee the final, now that would be a laugh

Some Munich supporting twot texted into "you're on Sky Sports" after the match to say that what Drogba did was worse than what Cantona did, and he should be given a similar ban. Yes, swearing and assault are comparable I suppose. To some people

If the referee had done his job at Old Trafford in the quarter finals, United would have been knocked out by Porto, he turned down a blatant penalty in that one. That gets forgotten though....

The fouls denied them goalscoring opportunities, hence why they were penalties. You'd be complaining if you were in the same situation. But look at all the opportunities that they just flat-out missed as well. And all the crosses that went awry. If their players had been mentally stronger tonight, they'd have scored again and killed the game instead of moping about penalties that werent given. You mean like you lot against Everton eh? Of course, you never complained after that one, did you? We ceretainly didn't complain to the extent that Chelsea did. You only had one to complain about that's why, they had 4.

The fouls denied them goalscoring opportunities, hence why they were penalties. You'd be complaining if you were in the same situation. But look at all the opportunities that they just flat-out missed as well. And all the crosses that went awry. If their players had been mentally stronger tonight, they'd have scored again and killed the game instead of moping about penalties that werent given. You mean like you lot against Everton eh? Of course, you never complained after that one, did you?

Haven't you learned anything in the last year? Boxing isn't about size, it isn't about a few pounds. Pac started at 106 and just destroyed two boxers who are naturally a lot bigger. Mayweather's style means size really becomes irrelevant, doesn't mean anything. Mayweather will sit on the ropes and Pacquiao will look to pick holes with quick, sharp punches. Mayweather has the perfect punch to disabled a southpaw, the lead right hand. And there's absolutely no way that Mayweather stops Pacquiao, not a chance. It's a 50/50 fight that needs to happen. Size most certainly does mean something, otherwise why bother with weight classes? Mayweather has advantages over Pac in height, weight, reach and is more skilled and has just as much speed too. This is a relatively easy fight to pick to be honest, people are getting excited because Pac stopped Hatton quicker than Mayweather did, it's meaningless. Unless Mayweather has slipped due to his absence (which I doubt he will have) he'll walk through Marquez with relative ease, then beat Pac too, lopsided decision or late stoppage due to Pac getting desperate like Hatton did when he fought Floyd. One other point - the De La Hoya that Mayweather beat was a different animal to the one that Pac beat too. I'm with Gabby on this, I've not got a doubt in my mind that Mayweather will win if the fight comes off.

It's wrong to try to put blame on Mayweather for this loss, it's hardly Mayweathers fault that Hatton lost his head on the night, he even asked him what the hell he was playing at after the first round - and for most of the 2nd round it appeared it had sunk in. Hatton actually got caught with that big left hook twice towards the end of the round, the first time wasn't quite as accurate as the 2nd one but it would have taken his head off had it landed cleanly. Then the berk bull-rushed forward right into the same shot again :shock: Mayweather Snr might be a bit of a prick, but he is a very good trainer....can't polish a turd though I'm afraid. My initial pick for this was Pac by late KO and I still think that's what would have happened if Hatton had fought like he did against Malignaggi, and not like he fought against Tszyu.

Seen the weigh in pics, so much for the so- called size difference....I'm sticking with my pick, Pac-man in the 11th.

I've been flip-flopping on this one but my mind is now made up, Pac-man by late stoppage, and I'm unanimous in that. Hatton hates lefties, doesn't deal well with speed and despite being the bigger man I don't think that's enough. The referee might once again be the deciding factor in a Hatton fight I feel. If he's allowed to get away with his dirty tactics he might get a late stoppage but if the referee applies the letter of the law we'll see a break-down of Hatton and another fortnight of crying, like we did after the Mayweather fight.

Doesn't that just make him a good father though? My old man wasn't the biggest football fan on earth and as a result I had to wait until I could pay for it myself before I could go to Villa matches. Clarkson doesn't like football, his son shows an interest so he takes him along and tries to show an interest himself. Hardly something to criticise him for if you ask me - and I suspect if his son had shown an interest in Villa instead of Chelsea you'd probably agree on that :winkold:

He does have a point though, Birmingham is a toilet. Not as big a toilet as Manchester or Liverpool but still not the nicest place on earth.

Bradys column has upset a few filth fans today, apparently. I wonder why? http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/sport/sunsport_columnists/article2302149.ece :shock:

Get a couple of prostitutes on the last night of your trip, empty your sack everywhere and that way you'll last a lot longer for the wife. Show some consideration for **** sake I always view Valentines day as an opportunity to wind people up myself, especially fat women. Maybe I'm missing the point?