-
Posts
1,365 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Gallery
Downloads
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Articles
Media Demo
Store
Events
Posts posted by Tubby
-
-
On 26/09/2022 at 00:26, maqroll said:
My problem is I just don't pay enough attention to the NFL. I'd never even heard of Ekeler before the draft!
Seems like there's been a shift to WR being the marquee fantasy position..I should have drafted Diggs.
On 26/09/2022 at 10:11, Beastmix said:I think the RB position diminished in value in each season since RG3 ushered in the era of mobile, rushing QBs.
The value comes entirely from the scarcity (and likelihood of injury) at the position and more teams opting for a committee of RBs, rather than pinning it mainly on one guy. There's only a few teams who go with the 'bell-cow' running back these days, and so everybody tries to snap them up early.
That's how I see it anyway.
Interesting thoughts. Whilst the RB position isn't what it used to be in terms of an offensive game plan, there are still some very good RBs in the league.
In terms of fantasy, RBs aren't being scored as favourably as WRs. As an example, this week I scored 11.60 points for Najee Harris (15 carries, 56 yards, 1 TD; 3 Rec, 5 yards; 1 fumble knocked a couple of points off) and 12.90 points for Drake London (3 Rec, 54 yards, 1 TD). NH is clearly doing a lot more work for the same amount of points and that doesn't feel right to me. Looking at the scoring, RBs and WRs are the same in terms of distance related points however, WRs get 0.5 points per reception whereas there is no carry points for RBs.
@Beastmix To avoid amending the distance scoring, perhaps for next season, 0.25 points per carry should be awarded to RBs? Using my example, NH would have received 17.35 points (+3.75 for carries, +2 adding the fumble back) and Drake London 12.90 which feels more reflective of the effort each player made.
Example 100 yard game with TD:
RB: 20 carries (5 points), 100 yards (10 points), bonus (1.5 points), TD (6 points) = 22.5 points (17.5 points currently)
WR: 7 Receptions (3.5 points), 100 yards (10 points), bonus (1.5 points), TD (6 points) = 21 points
*Option to increase the points per reception to 1 but if a RB is also catching a lot of passes, this might quickly create an imbalance.
- 1
- 1
-
19 hours ago, Xela said:
I actually thought I had a reasonable team. Least i'll be near first pick next year!
On the flipside, I shouldn't be 3-0, but thanks to a fortunate schedule and playing the waiver wire, I've managed to paper over the cracks.
-
3 hours ago, Hornso said:
Browns only have themselves to blame for not being 3-0.
They should be 3-0. It's as feasible that they could be 0-3!
The offence is purring nicely under JB, but man that defence provides no reassurances.
- 2
-
What in the world are these trade proposals? Pull the other one @maqroll, Burrow for Julio Jones? Had a beer is it?
- 2
-
Browns went full Browns this week... except they won! Cade York FTW!
- 1
-
On 04/09/2022 at 23:56, Hornso said:
Think my side is pretty poor, but we'll see. Tellingly my biggest annoyance was missing out on Cade York by one pick.
On 05/09/2022 at 00:23, Tubby said:You're welcome
@Hornso Can't deny I'm feeling pretty smug right now
- 1
-
15 minutes ago, maqroll said:
This doesn’t appear anywhere on the app for me.
First, check your emails for an invite.
When/if you've accepted, it will be in the app under the home button (I'm using Android). It looks like a house.
- 1
-
Looking forward to another season of being decidedly average!
-
27 minutes ago, Hornso said:
Think my side is pretty poor, but we'll see. Tellingly my biggest annoyance was missing out on Cade York by one pick.
You're welcome
- 1
-
14 minutes ago, LancsVillan said:
I've actually tried a couple of mock drafts from 10th this year and despite being happy with my selections I haven't got anything above a D in the report.
Long old year ahead
I wouldn't read too much into the ratings, the projections aren't based on our league scoring (so far as I know). Your strategy is probably sound if you feel good about it.
- 1
-
Going to be an interesting season for sure. Feels like the value has spread out a bit, hopefully that's good for competition.
-
9pm Sunday is dreamy
- 2
-
Sunday works better for me, I'm best man at a wedding Friday/Saturday so zero chance to attend then. It looks like it will be Friday, so I'll set an autopick.
-
With training camps on the horizon, I thought I'd give this a bump.
Who's in and what date are we setting for the draft... Sunday 4th September?
- 1
-
59 minutes ago, Gompedyret said:
Aaw. Spending time coming up with a gillarious pun, all in vain.
The one that got away!
- 1
-
Do we just login to confirm our participation?
That's what I've done, but all of the same teams from last season are already there too so just want to check there is no magic button to press?
- 1
-
-
9 hours ago, paul514 said:
Well it is completely not needed unless you are selling Konsa or Mings for centre back as we just gave a new deal to Hause and have have just signed Chambers.
It's the same deal with the striker, we have two quality strikers plus a multitude of forwards who can play that position you don't sign a third quality striker to be third choice when you play one up top.
Personally I wanted to sign a first choice centre back instead of chambers and I would happily sell Ings already to have Alvarez.......Exactly. I would consider moving Mings on and I think we are ambitious enough to seek improvements up front. Ollie wouldn't enter that conversation for me, far too versatile, so it would be Ings I would seek to upgrade. None of it essential and all a nice problem to have, but we are well covered elsewhere and these investments, at that time, would seem logical to me.
- 1
-
2 hours ago, paul514 said:
We aren't buying another centre back after signing chambers and we 100% will not sign a first team striker unless we sell ings or watkins.
We'll see. Maybe not now, but in the summer.
-
Jack = £100m
less
Net (£17m)
Decent haul
Hopefully still some left over for a couple of key signings now and in the summer; DM / CB / ST / Coutinho fee
-
On 07/01/2022 at 21:32, Hornso said:
I don’t want to jump the gun but unfortunately I feel the #1 pick will be open to a league newcomer next season.
Nice carrot to dangle.
I don't know the details other than the posts earlier in the thread, so do you say this because BM doesn't want to play, or because sadly he won't be well enough?
Wondering if we can make a gesture in memoriam if the latter i.e. rename the trophy?
Edit: not meaning to come across as insensitive by the way, it's just an idea how we might recognise someone that's been a part of the fabric for decades.
- 1
-
1 hour ago, rjw63 said:
Well I was pick 10 this year, by which time all the top RB's had gone.
yahoo suggested grabbing the best WR at 10 if there were no top RBs which is what I did.
So if anyone doesn't want the #1 pick I'll have it
It's not the #1 pick that bothers me as such, it's waiting to 24 and 25 before making the next selection. It's a hard strategy to get right cause most of the top WRs are gone by then and you're left with a top RB, a serviceable WR and possibly a good TE or premature dip into the QB market.
It might just be me mind you, I average 7th for a reason
-
13 hours ago, Beastmix said:
Just to be clear, the consolation draft winner getting #1 pick would not be valid for this up-coming draft. I was posing the idea (which I don't necessary even like) for future seasons.
Thanks for clarifying @Beastmix My personal view is that the #1 pick isn't a reward in fantasy football so the incentive would be low. Just my opinion.
- 1
-
1: Longer draft pick time - at least 45 seconds, 1 minute could get tedious if people are dragging it out. But it's about being able to select the best players for your teams so whatever makes it fair.
2: Reverse draft order (NFL style - last place picks first) - should consolation playoff winner earn #1 pick? - Did I win the consolation playoffs? If I did, I don't want the #1 pick. I personally think the order should be reverse finishing position so worst goes first and best goes last. I'll be quite happy sat there in the middle thank you
3: One-day trade processing - Yep
4: No waiver window. Just first come/first served on the free agents. - can waiver windows be set to a better time than current (I don't know what the current time is btw). It does bother me that you only find out on the Wednesday before that you have a player so I would suggest any player dropped during a live weekend can't be claimed but otherwise, they are readily available.
5: Change playoffs from top 6 to top 8 - I'm up for expanding it. If it's close, then it keeps the league relevant right to the end- 1
Fantasy NFL 2022-'23
in North American Sports
Posted
The reason why I'm pro points per carry (albeit small amounts) is the example I gave. A RB with 15 carries had the same amount of points as a WR with three catches. Yards aside, it's not the same effort and the RB should be recognised imho.
Happy to put it to a vote, at the appropriate time, as we should.