Thug

Agreed.

To be fair, when there is a tragedy, there is usually more than one mistake, and ergo more than one party to blame. So he wasn’t ‘shifting blame’ rather ‘distributing’ it. With the obvious advantage of hindsight, would you not agree that the potential risks were not fully assessed and therefore it was a mistake? Or maybe they WERE fully assessed, but the assessment was wrong.

He’s obviously been taught the concept of backtracking after doing damage is easy.

Thanks dude.

Yo, magnkarl. Out of curiosity… would you classify current conflict as a war of attrition? just asking, no reason.

Ok, dear private. I did not say that ‘war of attrition’ is a concept that does not exist. I do think that if you believe this current conflict to genuinely be a war of attrition then I shall need to post hundreds upon hundreds of ROFL emojis. So I ask you to reaffirm your GENUINE belief, that this is a war of attrition so that I can stop debating with you and forgive your previous posts based on some previous brain injury or similar explanation.

Lol, why won’t you answer dude? come on man, not a hard question. Ok let’s even it up a bit. Israel has to be blindfolded. Heck, BANGLADESH just joined in! israel 9m blindfolded. vs Indonesia, Nigeria, Bangladesh. 664m fully fed & watered. Who's gonna win?

It wasn’t in the slightest bit amusing. That was an Ironic laugh. Only a ‘total moron’ would not see that. There is NOTHING amusing about death. You, and a couple of other posters continue to justify Israel’s methods, and continue to promote this BULLSHIT self defence rhetoric. I haven’t seen ANY posts justifying what Hamas did. I see plenty of posts continuing to give justification of the brutal response. I have no issue with the state of Israel, or Jewish people, but you guys seem to imply it at EVERY opportunity you can muster. I have a pretty MAJOR issue with the ONGOING slaughter under the guise of self defence. The ONLY morons in this space are the ones that bring up words like white supremacy and naziism for any any criticism of those ‘who can do no wrong.’ I can’t be arsed to go back through your posts, so maybe you can clarify for me now whether you support the ongoing genocide and blockade of essential humanitarian supplies. Then I will judge about whether you are a moron or not.

@Tumblerseven so you laugh at my suggestion of population size not being relevant in a war. ok, israel (9 million) vs Indonesia (275.5m) deathmatch. where’s your money? Come on man, you can answer this one. You know you can. Give it a go. wait let me add in Nigeria. 218m israel 9m vs Indonesia 275 + Nigeria 218 : total 493m Go!

The same cause it has always been. To take the entire land of Palestine and Jordan for itself.

Utter nonsense, irrelevant post. We are not talking about warfare of WW1. We are not talking about heroic soldiers putting their lives on the line where sheer numbers matter. Wars these days are won by computers, not humans. Israels 9 million could beat the Middle East’s 200 million without breaking sweat. You know it, I know it, and Biden knows it. But he’s still sending $100bn to them - probably to pay for the propaganda because I don’t know what equipment they need? Large populations these days are a hinderance, not an advantage. One American warship could probably win this war. Population : few hundred I’d guess.

And yet more. i have said MULTIPLE times that Israel have every right to exist, and it’s people to lead a peaceful life not threatened at all times. I have stated multiple times that what Hamas did was horrific. im laughing at your statement about ‘main cause’ If you want to try to portray me as some white supremacist nazi for not wanting an entire population decimated under the bullshit disguise of self defence then more power to you. ok, now that you have listed populations of the world, I’d be grateful if you could now post military budgets too. Thanks in advance.

Woahhhh Population of London 10 million. (I’m sure that on some level this is very relevant) anyone that posts like this, clearly doesn’t want Israel to exist. Shame on you.

Here we go, right on queue.

The purpose of the posters is to incite a furious reaction which is then to be captured on video and posted online in an attempt to say ‘seeeee.. I told you so.’ That’s the point. The people tearing them down are stupid for a) Not accepting these people are victims of a crime b) for falling into the trap.

Oh wow, you now sound like Hamas. kinda ironic, no?

Ftfy

Bloomberg They veto the resolution for a temporary ceasefire to allow aid in, and then given Israel a $99.999999bn (the rest for Ukraine) voucher to spend in the WeaponsAre.US store. These guys are hilarious. And quite frankly, shoulder the largest share of the blame in this entire saga. Closely followed by our very own cretins. Even more so than the Israeilis and Palestinians.

Indeed. But the lesson here is, if you tell the world that if Maggie doesn't move out, you're gonna kill maggie. And you've killed lot's of maggies before. Then you go to Maggie's house and smash her windows saying you're gonna kill the bitch tomorrow. Then tomorrow you pick up a gun and off you go to Maggie's house shouting bitch ain't moved, I'm gonna kill her... You're gonna look like a tit when you blame Fred (Maggie's husband), and carry on smashing other Maggie's windows.

Fair enough. Shame though.

Not for Morgan though, watch it for the Egyptian guy. He's quite frankly sensational.

I took a few days off, because I could feel myself getting very frustrated... and had to go cool off. Apologies to anyone I offended. My biggest issue with the whole debacle is the blatantly biased reporting. Anyone watch Piers Morgan? He is just one of hundreds of reporters who seem to have been "told" about how to approach any interview. The only thing he does is shout "do you condemn October 7th". He's (as with the others) like a dog with a bone. No one can say anything until the start by condemning the attacks. It's an utter farce. Even if they condemn the attacks, the reporters want the guest to condemn again at every point they make. It's so biased, it's disgusting. Palestinian ambassador : "Do you condemn the attacks...?" non stop interrupting, and frankly embarrasing. Israeli embassador isn't asked about warcrimes at all. No difficult questions at all. It's not what journalism is about - or at least it shouldn't be. One guest has been able to completely school the prat. It's quite an intriguing watch - if only to watch him be utterly out-manouvred by a thoroughly intelligent Egyptian comedian. I thoroughly recommend a watch. Anything difficult : "It's actually not my job to answer your questions". Go back and watch the interview with Ben Shapiro, and see how Piers "interviews" him for comparrison. Also, this guy pretty much encompasses everything I have been trying to say, but much much more eloquently. Please watch.

As much as I don't agree with Israeli policy, I find this kind of behaviour absolutely disgusting. It's these type of people that do so much damage and negatively affect the cause. Utter imbeciles. You can bet your bottom dollar that there will be Jewish people that do more for the palestinian cause than these **** will ever do.

Strangely enough I completely missed your previous reply, even though I went back to look. That’s why I was so confused. Apolgies @fruitvilla