hawkinsk11

Thoughts on the new season: Last year Red bull took awhile to get going, they wont this year so that’s not good for the 'Drama'. McLaren had the fastest car at a lot of the races last year so should be there or thereabouts this year. The problem is McLaren have lost Hamilton which means they'll have no idea how fast their car really is. If you looked at Lewis in the last few races you'd think McLaren are right there, if you look at Button you'd say the car is struggling, I base this manly on qualifying and ignoring Buttons gift of a Brazilian win, I cant help thinking when the best McLaren can manage is P6 and they are spending millions on 'new bits' that there will be people in then team wondering if its just the drivers fault and not the car. I also think McLaren hired Perez because of his ability to save tyres, they now have two drivers who can manage tyres consistently and they can now develop in that direction. The problem with this is I reckon they won’t qualify high, but will hope to move through the field, that’s a risky strategy. Ferrari: just give Alonso a fast car FFS!! Not even the fastest, just faster than last year. Oh and Massayou're bald mate, get over it. Merc: cant wait to see what Lewis does, guaranteed to bring 6 tenths but they already had a high tyre wear problem and he aint going to help that, also they have so many technical people that used to be tech directors I cant see how there is a clear vision for the car. Lotus: new car looks like the old one which I think is a good thing also it is meant tohave that clever air system that they couldn't get to work last season, I think they will pretty much do what they did last year but if kimi can improve qualifying you never know... The others: who doesn’t want Williams back near the top?? Hopefully they make another step forward and I think Bottas will shine. The rest mean nothing to anyone.. But if the no hopers at the back start beating the odd team in front that could be interesting

Congrats on google, great isn't it... Yeah i know what your saying just. I'm stressing the point that i don't think these others actually did what you think they did. and i wouldn't class it a serious gap in his CV, he probably will though!

Brazil Team in the final.. some good players there. Every team has a star man and some are more of a star than others but 1 man does not win the a tournament, this ain't tennis [1] MARCOS (GK) [2] CAFU © [3] LUCIO [4] ROQUE JUNIOR [5] EDMILSON [6] ROBERTO CARLOS [8] GILBERTO SILVA [9] RONALDO (-90') [10] RIVALDO [11] RONALDINHO (-85') [15] KLEBERSON

Are you saying Ronaldo dragged Brazil to the 2002 world cup? (1984 is before my time)

No one man has ever dragged a team to anything! i find it amazing that anyone whos played the game at any level can say that. The whole Maradona '86 world cup is completely over blown. All round that was a very good side or they wouldn't have got anywhere, as good as Maradona was he was shit in goal and even worse at left back. A great player gives you that extra 10% but if you are start at 30% then i don't care who its that team wont win. It be great if Messi wins a world cup but he legend wont rest on it

I really think its getting to the stage were its not even an argument any more.. was at the champs league game last season when he scored 5 unbelievable will be one to tell the grand kids about

Viewing players in pre season and training is very different to viewing them in competition. This is especially so for Lambert as the whole team is new to him. Just a theory, but I wouldn't be surprised if Lambert has used the firt two matches almost as sacrificial lambs in the hope of testing the merits of certain players whilst the window is still open. No other reason I can think of for not choosing a similar team to West Ham other than to observe players like Delf, Bannan, Herd over Weimann, Ireland and Delph. Off the back of this, expect PL to be very clear about what he needs to add to the squad. (answer: a lot) To be honest if its not this then the team selection yesterday was absolute maddness and very worrying

2? he's not good enough. And its not like he's young anymore

i Just remember thinking if Milner carries on like that in mid field he'll be the new Gerrard. but he left and ended up playing on the wing, if playing at all, and will never achieve what he could have. He was becoming our main man and we never really recovered from him leaving more than MON

The boat scene is actually a pretty major part of the jokers story arch and is explained by him and batman while they fight. Joker believes that the world is fundamentally a bad place and everyone in it if given the right push will do horrible things. Batman believes the opposite. Joker does things throughout the whole movie to prove he's point, kill the other goon to join his gang, kill Reese or hell blow the hospital, make your hero batman give up or more people die and finally blow up the other boat to survive. Batman believes there is good and he dresses as batman to inspire the people to respond and safe their city. The boat scene is the final 'well which one of us are right?' moment and is a major moment of the story. As for TDKR I liked it more the second time but I feel the gap between when the football pitch and the beginning of the final act is too long and repeats old themes from BB. The first movie is an origins and can only be classed as a pretty good foundation. TDK is a crime movie batman is called the worlds greatest detective and should have always been based in a crime type envoirment, it suits he's character and the movie is the better for it. TDKR is a war movie. What would batman do in a war zone, for me this takes away from what batman is and forces him out of the dark and it means he's exposed and doesnt get to do much batman stuff. I wasn't convinced. Having said all that I did like it because, well, they took batman out of the dark and out him in a warzone and that's kinda cool. It just wasn't pulled off as well as TDK

I agree with most of this which saves me the typing. Its good its not better than TDK cause that had an amazing performance by the Joker that gave that whole movie an edge that nothing will ever be able to copy or better. Like it or not a movie like this hangs on the 'bad guy' i love Tom Hardy but i think hes wasted in this, yes he's big so what! they might as well of got some wrestler in like they did in the last Batman incarnation. He wears a mask which unfortunately confirmed my initial reservations, you cant see any expressions the actor makes and you cant under stand a word he says (slight exaggeration). i really couldn't engage with Bane, when the joker comes on the screen in TDK he owns it u hang on every word, every mannerism. Bane doesn't work for me. The rest is as per what i quoted its good maybe with another watch with less hype and excitement i might enjoy it more

I have never ever seen a proper movie (as in not a crap comedy type thing or B movie) that was such a mess. I honestly cant see how it got by any screenings and surly Ridley watched it and realised that it didn't make any sense?? It beautifully shot but i really in shock about how the movie was released in that state

spot on! he needs to this as milner did before him, till then he's not good enough

Need to stop looking at these spoilers cause i've gone from worry to dread!!

the only thing is as stevo says the joker would have looked pretty stupid, and with a photo taken out of context like that its always going to look bad. question is why release a photo that looks that bad? that's the worrying thing the quality control is slipping, the joker reveal was first class, this aint **edit just realised my avatar is back in fashion! only took like 3 years but i hung in there