This type of thread has become a little more tolerable since Douglas left and we have been taken over by a Board who seem to have the unearthly notion of allowing the appointed manager to manage and have a big say, nay, a total say I imagine, in what players we're going to sign.
No longer do we have to put up with "in the knows" puffing out their chests on forums nor, more notoriously, on golf courses claiming to have insider knowledge on transfers. Or at any rate, we know we can now take all that with a larger pinch of salt than ever. Unless anyone happens to know Martin O'Neill that well, then such claims no longer hold any water, though in this respect I wonder if things have really changed that much at, say, Manchester United.
Some people may scoff and say that there are too many people who take far too much notice of what such and such a player is like on FM - I've scoffed myself.
Let's not be too critical though. Ever since I can remember the most avidly-read parts of the sports sections of Sunday newspapers were the transfer tittle-tattle bits. And indeed, managers and clubs used to feed this demand. It was all part of the wheeling and dealing - feeling the temperature of the water, notifying others of interest or players they might be willing to release, bumping up prices to **** rivals over, bringing their own players to heel even.
Newspapers, particularly the Sundays, still do this and now we have forums like this one, all nice and hands-on, where we can exchange ideas, start rumours, con one another, etc. And of course a good 90% is bilge - fine, that's the way things have always been. Those in the know are often far worse than some of us, guys & gals!
\muse-wibble