No it's not, it's my body, and the government has no right to decide what happens to it, if I want to donate, it's my right to opt in, it's not the government right to demand it.
What's next? The government deciding how long we live for? A shite idea and one I would protest about!!
That's an odd analogy. I'd love to hear an explanation of how it fits into our discussion lol.
Nobody is telling anybody they must do anything, no rights are being lost because you can opt out.
All that's happening is a change in the presumption for people who do nothing from a 'no I don't want to donate' to a 'yes I'd be happy to save a life'. Far be it from me to put words in your mouth, but I think that is where your beef is, you believe as a point of principle it should be the other way around.
Whatever angle I look at it from I still believe your wrong and I haven't read a compelling argument in this thread to make me change my mind, because as I said, no rights are being lost and lives will be saved. So the point of principle argument is all that the people opposed have got.
My only concerns are with the homeless, mentally ill and disabled. People who might be incapable of opting out for some reason.