Mr_Dogg

Well you're ruining 40 minutes of good sleep right there.

as-in christian musicians? such as Tim Hughes, Deliriois?, Matt Redman. Im aware none of those will mean anything but they are the more famous ones, espeically Delirious? OK.

christian artists? Does that mean what it seems to mean?

It certainly has the potential for a slip up, away from home against a team who are slowly improving and have been unlucky. :|

I do think there needs to be a Spurs/Harry Redknapp thread where everything Spurs related goes.

Despite our recent number of draws, win this and we are in a really great position. We then have some winnable games coming up after this and we need to rack up the points.

What he actually means is she'd look better taking a shit.

I was hoping for 4 points from these 2 games, whichever one we won I didn't mind, Looks like we need to win at West Ham so!

And that little lad grew up to be....

Penalty to them.

Heskey fecked.

:? Is your perfect game a 0-0? Because mistakes and defensive errors are what lead to goals. BBC and SKY analyse the shit out of games and all they talk about are mistakes, he should have got tighter, he left his man free, he tracked the ball not his man etc etc... Forcing a team to make mistakes is what leads to goals. BBC and SKY are pessimists! 0-0 could be perfect game but not necessarily perfect result. 0-0 could be really entertaining game with some spectacular goalkeeping. I don't know about forcing a team to make mistakes ...? Maybe we have different philosophy? Excellent team score spectacular goals, without the opposite side making any mistakes. Well no, every goal could be stopped when you analyse, an interception there, a tackle here. Maybe 5% of goals are spectacular.

:? Is your perfect game a 0-0? Because mistakes and defensive errors are what lead to goals. BBC and SKY analyse the shit out of games and all they talk about are mistakes, he should have got tighter, he left his man free, he tracked the ball not his man etc etc... Forcing a team to make mistakes is what leads to goals.

What if losing to Wigan and Blackburn tells the real story? What if winning against Chelsea and Liverpool were just accidents? I'm probably the most negative poster on here. I am the real villain! But every game and result tells us where we are and who we are. Or vice versa? At least you know you're negative though.

NAMING RIGHTS

Well Chelsea weren't CL tired firstly and secondly defending is a part of playing well. I didn't think we defended particularly well today which affected the rest of the team especially midfield. Against Chelsea the ball was passed out of defence, not always but, more than it was today.

Too. Many. Innuendos.

:? :? You said we played better than we did against Chelsea. A game where most people agreed we played very well indeed. Of course you are entitled to believe we didn't play well in either game if you want, which seems to be what you are saying.

Christ, I think I know now who nicked ClaretMahoney's drugs! Played better today than we did against Chelsea? That's as mental a statement as I've ever read on VT. So good result=play good, bad result = play bad. Is that it? We played poor today with an improved performance in the 2nd half. I'd almost always take a draw away from home but we did not play well. How can you say we did? 4 of our front 6 were off form.

Sidwell was very poor, he kept turning on the ball and losing it, then he topped it off by giving a way a penalty.

Or just **** hit it with conviction.

AVFC: Friedel; Cuellar, Collins, Dunne, Warnock; Milner, Petrov, Sidwell, Young, Agbonlahor, Carew. Subs: Guzan, Luke Young, Clark, Reo-Coker, Delph, Gardner, Heskey.

How bad do you think Wolves are? That team will not and should not be selected.

Um, I have seen all 4 episodes so luckily the above don't bother me, but FFS spoilers.

I was just thinking of what Jones and Bent did to Wolves. If only we had 2 similar players...