Thug

Woahhhh Population of London 10 million. (I’m sure that on some level this is very relevant) anyone that posts like this, clearly doesn’t want Israel to exist. Shame on you.

Here we go, right on queue.

The purpose of the posters is to incite a furious reaction which is then to be captured on video and posted online in an attempt to say ‘seeeee.. I told you so.’ That’s the point. The people tearing them down are stupid for a) Not accepting these people are victims of a crime b) for falling into the trap.

Oh wow, you now sound like Hamas. kinda ironic, no?

Ftfy

Bloomberg They veto the resolution for a temporary ceasefire to allow aid in, and then given Israel a $99.999999bn (the rest for Ukraine) voucher to spend in the WeaponsAre.US store. These guys are hilarious. And quite frankly, shoulder the largest share of the blame in this entire saga. Closely followed by our very own cretins. Even more so than the Israeilis and Palestinians.

Indeed. But the lesson here is, if you tell the world that if Maggie doesn't move out, you're gonna kill maggie. And you've killed lot's of maggies before. Then you go to Maggie's house and smash her windows saying you're gonna kill the bitch tomorrow. Then tomorrow you pick up a gun and off you go to Maggie's house shouting bitch ain't moved, I'm gonna kill her... You're gonna look like a tit when you blame Fred (Maggie's husband), and carry on smashing other Maggie's windows.

Fair enough. Shame though.

Not for Morgan though, watch it for the Egyptian guy. He's quite frankly sensational.

I took a few days off, because I could feel myself getting very frustrated... and had to go cool off. Apologies to anyone I offended. My biggest issue with the whole debacle is the blatantly biased reporting. Anyone watch Piers Morgan? He is just one of hundreds of reporters who seem to have been "told" about how to approach any interview. The only thing he does is shout "do you condemn October 7th". He's (as with the others) like a dog with a bone. No one can say anything until the start by condemning the attacks. It's an utter farce. Even if they condemn the attacks, the reporters want the guest to condemn again at every point they make. It's so biased, it's disgusting. Palestinian ambassador : "Do you condemn the attacks...?" non stop interrupting, and frankly embarrasing. Israeli embassador isn't asked about warcrimes at all. No difficult questions at all. It's not what journalism is about - or at least it shouldn't be. One guest has been able to completely school the prat. It's quite an intriguing watch - if only to watch him be utterly out-manouvred by a thoroughly intelligent Egyptian comedian. I thoroughly recommend a watch. Anything difficult : "It's actually not my job to answer your questions". Go back and watch the interview with Ben Shapiro, and see how Piers "interviews" him for comparrison. Also, this guy pretty much encompasses everything I have been trying to say, but much much more eloquently. Please watch.

As much as I don't agree with Israeli policy, I find this kind of behaviour absolutely disgusting. It's these type of people that do so much damage and negatively affect the cause. Utter imbeciles. You can bet your bottom dollar that there will be Jewish people that do more for the palestinian cause than these **** will ever do.

Strangely enough I completely missed your previous reply, even though I went back to look. That’s why I was so confused. Apolgies @fruitvilla

Oh I’ve done plenty of reading. it was my turn to play 20 questions. This is not a short term problem. Let’s not even pretend that it is.

Pantos reply mentions nothing of religious right. once again, what do you mean that the illegal settlements are a solution for ‘short-term’ problem?

You’ve lost me again. what religious right is a short term problem? And please l, no cryptic answers

What? ‘A political mistake’? Whats the short term problem in Israel?

Which point? That the European Jews of many centuries, don’t have a right to go to the West Bank and evict a Palestinian of many centuries and take their home? Im wrong there?

I didn’t do this. I made a point that the Zionist god-given claim to the land was absurd. International law has already made it clear that the settler movement is illegal. Israel continue with impunity. Netanyahu has clearly stated that he is not done until the whole of Palestine is taken by Israel. Britain's response - rather than to uphold the law, they change the definition of anti-semitism to include criticism of Israel foreign policy.

The white people living in America should of course be allowed to live there. The anglo Saxons living here should be allowed to live there. The jewish people in Israel (proper) should be allowed to live there ( I have never suggested otherwise), and allowed to live there in peace, without fear of rockets or attacks. Now ask @fruitvilla and @magnkarl what they think.

On a serious level, what was your point?! Other than say no one has rights?

You clearly don’t! I was waiting for something genuinely interesting. Lol, and you hit me with that! ’rights are just a social construct’ wtf dude So no one has rights?? So human rights (also a social construct) are worthless?

That’s exactly what the Israeli say about human rights

**** me, you were gonna take me through an hour of to-ing and fro-ing for that bullshit sentence?

You’ve joined the conversation mid-point and don’t understand that my response was to another poster claiming the Jewish people of Europe were the indigenous population and suggesting that their claim to the land was real. My post was proving that there were people there before them. If you bother to read the whole conversation, you will understand that it is me that you are agreeing with. The black man living in London has every right to be there. If some bat-ass crazy pulled him out of his home and moved some white family in because ‘their ancestors from 4000 years ago lived there’ you’d think WTAF. No?