Fair comment but I want our best player to be committed to the cause and not lose focus as soon as another club comes sniffing. If he’s close to or at the end of his contract or Villa want to sell then fine. But to have such a clause in a contract means the risk of Jack leaving will come up every year unless the player gets injured or loses form.
Agreed. A release clause indicates less than 100% commitment. Our best player should be fully on board and not looking to move on at the first opportunity..
If Jack does stay then great but he must be 100% committed to the project, we don’t need this soap opera playing out every summer. If his head has been turned , let’s move on and rebuild so we can prove him wrong. UTV!
Too much smoke regarding the speculation now unfortunately. Hard to know what Grealish thinks but if his desire is to win trophies and win them soon then sadly Man City will be the best choice. If he does go it will be interesting how the ownership handles this.