Daniel1Avfc

Fking disgusting, im not happy.

The stupid collar just ruins them.

The GK top is disgusting

Even says on wiki they've had an offer accepted http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nicklas_Helenius 22, 6ft5, sounds like a Benteke replacement to me.

Finally a link to a LB

Very Nice!

I'd prefer us to look for a younger GK, if we are looking for one.

is KSV itk? no

EIKREM sign him up Lambert!

Hypothetically who would he replace? Vlaar is our captain and Baker is vastly improving...

Right back backup for Lowton I think. Can he play LB? and most importantly for me... does he have pace?

Some people need a reality check. If we wouldn't pay 7m for Coutinho, then why on earth would we pay 15m for Belhanda?

Birmingham has one of the biggest mosques in europe.

The little blue and white flame wouldn't look bad on our top.

Swindon Town have Adidas and Samsung so... maybe it is Coca Cola

?

Or, more likely, some horrendous pay-day loan firm like Wonga or QuickQuid. If it is Wonga or QuickQuid then im not buying it, hopefully its just a alcohol company.

Not this again. 6ft is fine for CB. It may be fine, but 6ft6 is better. Why not just sign a couple of 6'9 basketball players? Hand ball isnt allowed in football, is it? Doesn't matter. They're really really tall so they must be better than any 6'0-ish CB right? Well no, basketball and football couldn't be more different. You know exactly what I'm getting at here. Your logic is that we should sign CBs based on height and I'm asking why shouldn't we just sign a couple of basketball players? It won't take long to teach them the rules if they don't know them already. If you must know, then yes a 6'9 basketball player would be a better CB than Barry Bannan. No shit. What about a 6'9 basketball player and Jores Okore? Thats the same as asking who is better at basketball....a basketball player or a football player?

Not this again. 6ft is fine for CB. It may be fine, but 6ft6 is better. Why not just sign a couple of 6'9 basketball players? Hand ball isnt allowed in football, is it? Doesn't matter. They're really really tall so they must be better than any 6'0-ish CB right? Well no, basketball and football couldn't be more different. You know exactly what I'm getting at here. Your logic is that we should sign CBs based on height and I'm asking why shouldn't we just sign a couple of basketball players? It won't take long to teach them the rules if they don't know them already. If you must know, then yes a 6'9 basketball player would be a better CB than Barry Bannan.

Not this again. 6ft is fine for CB. It may be fine, but 6ft6 is better. Why not just sign a couple of 6'9 basketball players? Hand ball isnt allowed in football, is it? Doesn't matter. They're really really tall so they must be better than any 6'0-ish CB right? Well no, basketball and football couldn't be more different.

Not this again. 6ft is fine for CB. It may be fine, but 6ft6 is better. Why not just sign a couple of 6'9 basketball players? Hand ball isnt allowed in football, is it?

Not this again. 6ft is fine for CB. It may be fine, but 6ft6 is better.

6ft CB hmmm, wouldn't Vestergaard be a better signing?

Cholobah has flair, he'd be a good loan for Villa.

Pearce terrible manager.