tomaspg

im guessing their pressconference tomorrow will be more to give the public some insight to what has happend, not to send ole off. they are fairly quick on the ball it seems, already looking at alternative sponsors instead of rokke http://fotball.rbnett.no/eliteserien/article237153.ece

someone on twitter brought up a valid point. Ole works for Molde not aker, Molde gave him permission to go and talk to villa and so he went. Ole has no obligations whatsoever to answer akers/rokkes questions or demands, it might have been in his interest to do so in hindsight, but he answers to molde only.

Good enough reason for OGS to leave the club then...and tell your old man if he thinks Rokke is a mafia boss in Norway does that make Joey Barton The Godfather of the premier league?

No way! There testing the water, Champions league next year and they want to backoff (Ok they wont get far but still!) dont think they are testing the waters... talked to my old man a couple of minutes ago, he desctibed rokke as the norweigan mafioso boss hehe.. apparently a temper not to be **** with

http://tinyurl.com/6wwet6v **** me, just saw the release,I'll be eating humble pie til I puke. Madness. Oh well, at least that's bridges burned for OGS unless this really is extortion by Aker. vem visste att norrman kunde ha ett sannt temprament yeh, i really cant see him staying at molde after that...

http://fotball.rbnett.no/eliteserien/article237145.ece apparently they did pull out because he went over here for talks, jesus christ what a over reaction.... apparently they thought he was illoyal due to the the fact that their league already had started, and that it became so open in the news that he was here for talks. and Ole has previously hinted publicly that he wasnt pleased with the small investment in the club. so they left the club. immediatley.... and now molde is in some deep shit

I think they said that they were planning on pulling out before villa was interested in Ole in some norweigan newspaper, cant remember which one though, been a few flying around today

imo its a done deal, i think hes just playing it down so he can sort his stuff out in norway. It would be a bit harsh of him to go out in the newspaper and say he has accepted the possition before talking to his own team/staff. especially on the day when their main money man left them. same guys who owned wimbledon a couple of years back. i do feel a bit for the molde supporters hehe... so hopefully its just scandinavian decency!

curtis davis is doing a great job for me... always a solid defender, rather play him than dunne or collins.... i do seem to have a problem with my players constantly getting injured, atleast 1 player per game, anyone knows how to prevent this? first time im playing and im on the second season.. going pretty good so far! the game seems a bit dodgy though, i dont have much problems beating arsenal, liverpool i even won against united and a draw against city. But when i meet teams like west ham or everton they fing rince me. 4-0 last game...

what has four legs and goes miaaaaaaau? a frozen dog on a band saw....

thank you, sweden is alright, but there is good and bad things with all countries, and i think saying that any country is better then the other is to simplify it a bit to much. The point is not wether they are serious or not, its that people have to sift through posts of spam to find one which actually has something that is relevant to the discussion, maybe im the only one finding this annoying. when i wrote "And you will all say the UK is the best country in the world etc etc" i was not being literal, i meant in broad terms, brits tend to be very proud of their country compared to other nationals. you're not quite getting what im trying to say here, when i was talking about raised taxes etc, im not saying that the richer people shouldn't pay more, im saying that they wont. big difference there. and im not quite sure which questions it is you want me to adress?

im swedish so a bit biased, but i thought svennis did a good job at england, it probably was about the right time for him to leave though

firstly, that was the points i was getting at beeing useless to this thread, you said other posters werent contributing, do you think these posts are? anyways, you want to continue a discussion reagarding the vailidity of posts you can send me a PM, rather then us hi-jacking someone elses thread. I never said anything about any 40-120 billion pounds beeing spent on anything. and no i never said all brits were bad at it, i was speaking in general terms, and if you didnt notice i said in the end that there are exeptions for everything. and when i was writing about other people giving something up for others i did not speak of stolen money, i was more thinking of terms of increased taxes, there was cries when the VAT went up to 22.5%(i think it was?). what do you think would have happened if there was talks about increasing the VAT to 25%, say, add on a tax around 50% on monthly earnings above say 3000 pounds, its all verry easy saying that the people in need has to recieve more aid, but when someone has to pay for it its a different story... and i dont think anyone in their right mind would think that its morally or ethically correct to take away aid from people in neeed. im afraid i think you misunderstood the majority of my post. EDIT: oh yeh, im from sweden

villafc2000, for someone complaining about other peoples post you are racking up the number of useless ones yourself. on the other hand i dont know how the inner workings of the UK welfare system works so i cant really comment on that. Where im from we were lucky enough to have one of the better welfare systems in the world, and IMO the only way of actually getting a system like that to work is by having the nations population showing some solidarity, which im afraid to say you brits arent to good at. You are all easy to get behind a footie team, and you will all say the UK is the best country in the world etc etc. But when there is talks about raising tax, not frauding away billions of pounds making the revenue of taxes ALOT smaller then they should be, when the people that have it better off gets the question if they would give some of it up for people in greater needs, do you think that they will? We dont get people who are as filthy rich as you do over here, or well, it happens but its rare. But on the other hand, id say most people live a resonable life, everyone has free health care, welfare, free education and it would take quite a few intentional cock ups before you would end up on the streets as there are "safety nets" so to speak. But it comes at a cost for everyone which is high taxes and so forth, but id say most people are more then happy to pay it as the returns are of good enough value. the people i really do feel sorry for are not the teenage parents, its their grand children which will be absolutley shafted, growing up in a council flat with parents and grandparents which probably are unemployed, uneducated, poor and im guessing their parental skills arent even close to what they should be, and to be honest you cant blame them, they have undertaken a job which most 25 - 30 year olds arent cut out to do, im not sure on what kind of information and/or aid they get in learning how to raise their kids but im guessing its nothing worth mentioning? Most teenage parents today still have a relative or grandparent etc that helps out raising the kid, but in a generation or two the teenage parents of today are the ones that will be trying to help their children raise their own kids, which doesnt sound like to much of a good idea to me. ofcourse there are exeptions to everything, im sure there are some 14 year old mothers out there that do a better job then a 30 year old one.