');
    • limpid

      Just visiting?   27/12/16

      Please click "Sign Up" and login to use the full functionality of the site.
  • entries
    4
  • comments
    5
  • views
    6,523

Where we are and why I'm positive

BOF

996 views

First off, let me say that just because this blog is called 'The Optimist' it doesn't automatically follow that I will fly in the face of criticising things that need to be criticised. Believe me, if I want to moan I will moan. But if I don't then I won't. I called it 'The Optimist' because in my years on VillaTalk I have come around to the realisation that on average I do tend to see the positive side of things more than most. So it seemed an apt name.

Anyway, on to Villa.

As a first post I may aswell give my $0.02 on what is happening this season and what I see happening from here onwards. I like it. I like what's happening. I think most people do. OK the results haven't been there yet in any consistent way, but then considering what has gone on in the past 2 years you wouldn't exactly demand that results change overnight. You'd like them to, sure, but you wouldn't demand it. In my view it would also be an unreasonably harsh (or blind?) critic that would try to argue that our style of play has not improved markedly over the past year. "Not hard" I hear you say. True dat. In fact it could be argued that we're trying to play a more expansive passing game now than we have since the days of Gregory or Little (the managers, not the players...) or even before them.

I also like what we are buying. Who they are, how old they are, where we're buying from and how much they are costing. Some are saying that Lambert is cleverly following the Borussia Dortmund model that he should know pretty well having played there and won the CL there and with it being where he allegedly took most of his coaching inspiration from. We can not compete with the monster budgets of the teams fighting for Champions League places and that leaves us with fewer options. You either buy the next tier of player who tends to cost more than he should and who; while playing for you; is thinking about where he'd rather be playing. Or you go lower down and cherry-pick the top talents who are gut-bustingly hungry to prove they can mix it with the big boys. And that's the key word - 'Hungry'. Something the 2nd tier players I mentioned can often lack if they see you as a 2nd option. We have a few in the squad right now ... Anyway, I digress. Bringing in players like Lowton, Westwood, Bennett et al is the way we have chosen to go. By supplementing that tactic with the kind of canny purchase like that of an up-and-coming Belgian national striker in Benteke, Lambert has created the kind of vibrancy, spirit and hunger in our squad that we have rarely seen at Villa and he is trying to align it with a playing philosophy that we hope will ultimately be successful but which will also be pleasant on the eye and frustrating on the opponent.

We will suffer bad days along the way. Indeed we are suffering bad days already. But we can see what we're trying to do and in some cases; Man Citeh away; it clicks and superior opposition on paper gets blown away. OK maybe that's putting it strongly, but I doubt many sides will go there this season and beat them 4-2 even allowing for the changes they made.

We are also going through this transition at quite a good time I think. There are poor teams in this league. This gives us potentially more of a safety net than you might ordinarily have. Of course it's not like you can go out and lose every game, but that's not what we're suggesting is required nor is it what we're currently doing. I think we will gradually click as the season goes on and we will pick up more than enough results to both keep our fans happy and keep us enough away from a fight against the 'R' word. Those 2 things being basically 2 ways of saying the same thing.

Anyway, I just thought I'd start off with that general overview of how I see it at the moment. Check back for the odd brainfart as and when they bubble to the surface.


  Report Entry


3 Comments


Recommended Comments

Good post BOF. Since this blog is titled "The Optimist", another positive aspect of this model is that it allows these younger players to develop together, chemistry if you will. I know Lambert likes to rotate and tinker with formations, but surely these are being worked on in training. With these players being young and adaptable, they can grow together and hopefully be with us for several years. You have seen this model work with Swansea and to a degree with Norwich as well as they have moved up divisions with little chop and change to the squad. At Villa Lambert will have the opportunity to create that same model with potentially a better squad as a starting point.

Lastly, this also allows us to link a strong academy more closely with the first team, something that has been sorely lacking the last 5 years. They will be young, hungry, technically proficient, and playing a style that is complementary from academy through the first team. Really looking forward to the progress.

The most interesting thing will be how Lambert views more senior players, and incorporates them into the system. He SHOULD have more opportunity to purchase some proven players with experience and quality here than he has in the past, and I think to date the biggest criticism (see: Morpheus) has been his inability or unwillingness to do so in the transfer market. I personally think this is really more of a TBD than a criticism, as he really hasn't had much time and only one window in which to act on this. January and next summer (pending Lerner investment) will ultimately provide the answer to that question.

Keep 'em coming.

Share this comment


Link to comment

Yeah good post Copey. The only thing that could potentially ruin the whole plan would be the 'R' word. If we manage to get through this pivotal season then it could all be very promising going forward; as you say from the Villa-grass roots right through to the senior side.

Share this comment


Link to comment


  • Posts

    • I'm for changing it up, but we shouldn't be almost fielding a whole new front 5-6. We lost Grealish and Adomah who were integral in our unbeaten streak, so we have to figure out how to replace them to get the players around them going again. I think this could do it. O'hare needs to be given a chance. Grabban proved he is more than a target man and can hopefully play similar to Adomah. Elmo needs to come back to right back because Snodgrass was lost without him. Jedinak had a poor match on Tuesday, and we are away from home, so I'd give Tuanzebe a chance there over Birkir. 
    • Well.....Grabban was being played out of position, new to the team and all that......looked not bad to me.
    • I remember our squad at the start of the season being good enough to challenge for a top half finish if we had a positive manager. We lost Young and Downing which were huge blows but we had an emerging Albrighton and N'zogbia who lit it up with Wigan the previous season to soften the blow. The problem was, McLeish was so negative that we ended up being in serious relegation danger rather than challenging for that top half. We had a joint PL record (tied with ourselves of course) of 17 draws that season, a good chunk of those being 0-0.
    • Actually, there is precious little comedy (TV, film, live) that I really enjoy. 
    • Already said but blimey Rob you Brummy bar steward
    • I accept the notion that Terry is putting forward about setting up and the examples he gives.....and equally Ron Saunders built a balanced team with square pegs in square holes etc.....but in 1981 we had no injuries. Whether you and Terry blame the manager or not he does not have the balance of player to come in and cover......There is no standout cover for Jack Grealish.....there is no standout cover for Albert.....Callum and Andre are yet to make their mark, its just speculative change. You may not blame the players, but it depends what context we mean by blame.....they may be played out of position and that may be inconvenient for them, but they can still challenge and muster effort, they can still put their foot in. You cannot simply negate the players from a poor performance.....just like you cannot negate the manager. They are all in it together, except one usually carries the can for the rest. but I ask you this question? If Keinan Davis buries his square shot on goal and we win 2-1.......Or he fails to overhit his pass the Birkir and its perfectly weighted and Birkir scores, which both was quite feasible. what then?....we win 2-1.....bet that would make a whole different complexion to the game. How can the manager affect that, but the players can. Look, I don't think he got all the calls right, thats my view, but I could live with an alternative view that the players didn't do it for him either. I don't think blame sits quite right at the moment, but to suggest players are not responsible for their own performances i think is wide of the mark. Ps Ian Taylor quoted I was very disappointed with the players ( no mention of the manager) PPS Gary Neville once said when asked did you players ever blame the manager for a defeat , he said no, Never we took the responsibility for a defeat ourselves.We blamed ourselves.
    • Dunno. Does it mean that you're young, or that you're old?  (I'm indisputably old, and I hate them - although many of my contemporaries would disagree). 
    • Wouldn't have made the slightest bit of difference to Bianchi, From the angle Massa got hit in the head with a spring i don't think the halo would have stopped it either. Looking at the way it is designed it doesn't prevent anything coming straight down vertically on top of your head either & this is what killed Henry Surtees 9 years ago and Justin Wilsons was pretty much the same, A Wheel & a nose cone right on top of the head, how will the halo stop any of this? There is little/no protection at all from anything coming down from above  
    • Put him at DM or center back, no where else bruce. He kills our attacks on the right, and leaves Snodgrass way too isolated. Even Hutton gets forward more often than Axel. 
    • Oh, sure. Just up the road (haven't been for a few years, mind).